Literature DB >> 25052124

Impact of previous midline laparotomy on the outcomes of laparoscopic intestinal resections: a case-matched study.

Erman Aytac1, Luca Stocchi, Julie De Long, Meagan M Costedio, Emre Gorgun, Hermann Kessler, Feza H Remzi.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of laparoscopic intestinal resection in patients with previous midline laparotomy (PML) is controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery and identify possible factors associated with postoperative outcomes in patients with PML. Patients with PML (at least an infraumbilical incision or longer) undergoing elective laparoscopic intestinal resection between 1997 and 2011 were case matched with patients without PML undergoing laparoscopic surgery based on age, gender, body mass index, ASA score, surgical procedure, and diagnosis. Fifty patients with PML undergoing laparoscopic intestinal resection were well matched to 50 counterparts. Conversion to open surgery (n = 8 vs. n = 4, p = 0.22), operating time (211 vs. 192 min, p = 0.22), and estimated blood loss (158 vs. 184 ml, p = 0.95) were similar between the groups. Intraabdominal adhesions (either disease related or from previous operations) were significantly more common in patients with PML (n = 24 vs. n = 11, p = 0.01). Intraoperative complications included inadvertent enterotomy and hemorrhage and were comparable between the groups (n = 1 vs. n = 0, p = 1 and n = 1 vs. n = 2, p = 1 for PML vs. no PML, respectively). One patient without PML died postoperatively from aspiration pneumonia. Overall morbidity (n = 26 vs. n = 10, p = 0.001) and particularly postoperative ileus (n = 10 vs. n = 3, p = 0.04) were significantly increased in the PML group when compared to laparoscopy without PML, unlike the respective differences in postoperative return of bowel function (4 vs. 3 days, p = 0.15), reoperations (n = 5 vs. n = 3, p = 0.72), length of hospital stay (9 vs. 6 days, p = 0.09), and readmissions (n = 5 vs. n = 4, p = 0.73). Intestinal resections in patients with PML can be frequently completed laparoscopically but are associated with worse postoperative outcomes when compared to laparoscopy on a virgin abdomen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25052124     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3719-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  34 in total

1.  Impact of previous abdominal surgery on the outcome of laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched control study.

Authors:  A Vignali; S Di Palo; P De Nardi; G Radaelli; E Orsenigo; C Staudacher
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery. A postmortem study.

Authors:  M A Weibel; G Majno
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Minimal-access colorectal surgery is associated with fewer adhesion-related admissions than open surgery.

Authors:  E M Burns; A Currie; A Bottle; P Aylin; A Darzi; O Faiz
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  Laparoscopic management of surgical complications after a recent laparotomy.

Authors:  D Rosin; O Zmora; M Khaikin; B Bar Zakai; A Ayalon; M Shabtai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Outcomes for case-matched laparoscopically assisted versus open restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  G S El-Gazzaz; R P Kiran; F H Remzi; T L Hull; D P Geisler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Does prior abdominal surgery influence conversion rates and outcomes of laparoscopic right colectomy in patients with neoplasia?

Authors:  Anaeze C Offodile; Sang W Lee; James Yoo; Richard L Whelan; Dovid Moradi; Raymond Baxter; Tracey D Arnell; Abu Nasar; Toyooki Sonoda; Jeffrey W Milsom; Daniel L Feingold
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Effect of previous abdominal surgery on outcomes following laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Masashi Yamamoto; Junji Okuda; Keitaro Tanaka; Keisaku Kondo; Keiko Asai; Hajime Kayano; Shinsuke Masubuchi; Kazuhisa Uchiyama
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  The incidence of adhesions after prior laparotomy: a laparoscopic appraisal.

Authors:  A I Brill; F Nezhat; C H Nezhat; C Nezhat
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Outcomes of elective laparoscopic colorectal operations in octogenarians at a district general hospital in South East England.

Authors:  Roland Fernandes; Irshad Shaikh; Samer Doughan
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-01-27
View more
  13 in total

1.  Hand-Assisted versus Straight-Laparoscopic versus Open Proctosigmoidectomy for Treatment of Sigmoid and Rectal Cancer: A Case-Matched Study of 100 Patients.

Authors:  Fazli C Gezen; Erman Aytac; Meagan M Costedio; Jon D Vogel; Emre Gorgun
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2015

2.  Laparoscopic versus open fecal diversion: does laparoscopy offer better outcomes in short term?

Authors:  E Gorgun; F C Gezen; E Aytac; L Stocchi; M M Costedio; F H Remzi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Attempting a Laparoscopic Approach in Patients Undergoing Left-Sided Colorectal Surgery Who Have Had a Previous Laparotomy: Is it Feasible?

Authors:  Murad A Jabir; Justin T Brady; Yuxiang Wen; Eslam M G Dosokey; Dongjin Choi; Sharon L Stein; Conor P Delaney; Scott R Steele
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Perioperative Factors Predicting Prolonged Postoperative Ileus After Major Abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Kotaro Sugawara; Yoshikuni Kawaguchi; Yukihiro Nomura; Yusuke Suka; Keishi Kawasaki; Yukari Uemura; Daisuke Koike; Motoki Nagai; Takatoshi Furuya; Nobutaka Tanaka
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Risk Factors for Prolonged Postoperative Ileus in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Carolina Quiroga-Centeno; Kihara Alejandra Jerez-Torra; Pedro Antonio Martin-Mojica; Sergio Andrés Castañeda-Alfonso; María Emma Castillo-Sánchez; Oscar Fernando Calvo-Corredor; Sergio Alejandro Gómez-Ochoa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Reoperative Abdomen or Pelvis.

Authors:  Amanda Feigel; Patricia Sylla
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-06

7.  Comparison of the Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Resections for Colorectal Cancer in Patients with a History of Prior Median Laparotomy.

Authors:  Young Wan Kim; Ik Yong Kim
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 0.656

8.  Comparison of laparoscopic jejunostomy tube to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube with jejunal extension: long-term durability and nutritional outcomes.

Authors:  Ivy N Haskins; Andrew T Strong; Mary Baginsky; Gautam Sharma; Matthew Karafa; Jeffrey L Ponsky; John H Rodriguez; Matthew D Kroh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer patients who underwent previous abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Soo Young Lee; Chang Hyun Kim; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy Following Prior Upper Abdominal Surgery (Pancreatectomy and Prior Surgery).

Authors:  Mushegh A Sahakyan; Tore Tholfsen; Dyre Kleive; Sheraz Yaqub; Airazat M Kazaryan; Trond Buanes; Bård Ingvald Røsok; Knut Jørgen Labori; Bjørn Edwin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.