Literature DB >> 22826032

Bioequivalence requirements in the European Union: critical discussion.

Alfredo García-Arieta1, John Gordon.   

Abstract

The aim of the present paper is to summarize the revised European Union (EU) Guideline on the Investigation of Bioequivalence and to discuss critically with respect to previous European requirements and present US Food and Drug Administration guidelines its more relevant novelties such as the following: in order to facilitate the development of generic medicinal products, the EU guideline includes the eligibility for Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS)-based biowaivers not only for BCS class I drugs but also for class III drugs with tighter requirements for dissolution and excipient composition. The permeability criterion of BCS classification has been substituted with human absorbability, as per the Biopharmaceutical Drug Disposition Classification System. The widening of the acceptance range for C (max) is possible only for highly variable reference products with an additional clinical justification. This scaled widening is carried out with a proportionality constant of 0.760 which is more conservative than the FDA approach and maintains the consumer risk at a 5% level when the intra-subject CV is close to 30%, due to the smooth transition between the scaled and the constant criteria. The guideline allows for the possibility of two-stage designs to obtain the necessary information on formulation differences and variability from interim analyses as a part of the pivotal bioequivalence study, instead of undertaking pilot studies. The guideline also specifies that the statistical analyses should be performed considering all factors as fixed, which has implications in the case of replicate designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22826032      PMCID: PMC3475855          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-012-9382-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  16 in total

1.  Computer simulations for bioequivalence trials: selection of analyte in BCS drugs with first-pass metabolism and two metabolic pathways.

Authors:  Carmen Navarro-Fontestad; Isabel Gonzalez-Alvarez; Carlos Fernández-Teruel; Alfredo Garcia-Arieta; Marival Bermejo; Vicente G Casabó
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 2.  Predicting drug disposition via application of BCS: transport/absorption/ elimination interplay and development of a biopharmaceutics drug disposition classification system.

Authors:  Chi-Yuan Wu; Leslie Z Benet
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  The use of BDDCS in classifying the permeability of marketed drugs.

Authors:  Leslie Z Benet; Gordon L Amidon; Dirk M Barends; Hans Lennernäs; James E Polli; Vinod P Shah; Salomon A Stavchansky; Lawrence X Yu
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Computer simulations of bioequivalence trials: selection of design and analyte in BCS drugs with first-pass hepatic metabolism: linear kinetics (I).

Authors:  Carlos Fernández-Teruel; Ricardo Nalda Molina; Isabel González-Alvarez; Carmen Navarro-Fontestad; Alfredo García-Arieta; Vicente G Casabó; Marival Bermejo
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 5.  Computer simulations of bioequivalence trials: selection of design and analyte in BCS drugs with first-pass hepatic metabolism: Part II. Non-linear kinetics.

Authors:  Carlos Fernández-Teruel; Isabel Gonzalez-Alvarez; Carmen Navarro-Fontestad; Alfredo García-Arieta; Marival Bermejo; Vicente G Casabó
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.384

6.  Truncated AUC evaluates effectively the bioequivalence of drugs with long half-lives.

Authors:  L Endrenyi; L Tothfalusi
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.366

7.  Comparison of single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics using clinical bioequivalence data and Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  A A el-Tahtawy; A J Jackson; T M Ludden
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Chiral bioequivalence: effect of absorption rate on racemic etodolac.

Authors:  J R Boni; J M Korth-Bradley; L S Richards; S T Chiang; D R Hicks; L Z Benet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  An eutomer/distomer ratio near unity does not justify non-enantiospecific assay methods in bioequivalence studies.

Authors:  Alfredo García-Arieta; Francisco Abad-Santos; M Angeles Rodríguez-Martínez; Yolanda Varas-Polo; Jesús Novalbos; Nikos Laparidis; Sonia Gallego-Sandín; Kyriakos Orfanidis; Juan Torrado
Journal:  Chirality       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.437

10.  Lack of bioequivalence between generic risperidone oral solution and originator risperidone tablets.

Authors:  S van Os; M Relleke; P Muniz Piniella
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.366

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Two-stage designs in bioequivalence trials.

Authors:  Helmut Schütz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Statistical comparison of dissolution profiles to predict the bioequivalence of extended release formulations.

Authors:  J D Gomez-Mantilla; U F Schaefer; V G Casabo; T Lehr; C M Lehr
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Investigation into the interchangeability of generic formulations using immunosuppressants and a broad selection of medicines.

Authors:  Yang Yu; Steven Teerenstra; Cees Neef; David Burger; Marc Maliepaard
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Bioequivalence of generic alendronate sodium tablets (70 mg) to Fosamax® tablets (70 mg) in fasting, healthy volunteers: a randomized, open-label, three-way, reference-replicated crossover study.

Authors:  Yifan Zhang; Xiaoyan Chen; Yunbiao Tang; Youming Lu; Lixia Guo; Dafang Zhong
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.162

5.  Withdrawal of two generic clopidogrel products in Saudi Arabia for non-bio-equivalence.

Authors:  Abdullah Saleh Alsultan; Hakeam Abdulaziz Hakeam
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.526

6.  An update on the clinical evidence that supports biosimilar approvals in Europe.

Authors:  Johanna Mielke; Bernd Jilma; Byron Jones; Franz Koenig
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  Equivalence and interchangeability of narrow therapeutic index drugs in organ transplantation.

Authors:  Atholl Johnston
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2013-08-29

8.  Between-Batch Bioequivalence (BBE): a Statistical Test to Evaluate In Vitro Bioequivalence Considering the Between-Batch Variability.

Authors:  Jonathan Bodin; Stéphanie Liandrat; Gabriel Kocevar; Céline Petitcolas
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.009

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.