Literature DB >> 7813639

Perception of vibrotactile stimuli during motor activity in human subjects.

L J Post1, I C Zompa, C E Chapman.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that voluntary motor activity decreases the ability to detect near-threshold electrical stimuli applied to the skin, but has no effect on the perception of either suprathreshold electrical stimuli or natural thermal stimuli (warmth, heat pain). The present study was undertaken to determine if the perception of natural tactile stimuli (vibrotactile) is diminished by motor activity (rhythmical isometric flexions and extensions about the elbow). The stimuli were applied at three different sites on the operant arm--ventral forearm, thenar eminence and distal digit--to examine also the influence of the proximity of the stimulated site to the active muscles on perception. The ability to detect near-threshold stimuli at the two more proximal stimulation sites was significantly reduced during the motor task, and these effects were more pronounced and widespread with higher levels of target force (20 N vs 50 N). Discrimination of small differences in the intensity of suprathreshold stimuli, at all three sites, was unchanged during the motor task. Finally, the subjective intensity of suprathreshold vibrotactile stimuli was reduced, in a nonlinear fashion, during the motor task; proximity again influenced the degree of modulation. In contrast a previous study showed no change in magnitude estimates of suprathreshold electrical stimuli during isotonic flexion and extension. Some possible reasons for the discrepancy are discussed. In addition, our previous suggestion that movement produces a simple reduction in the signal-to-noise ratio (i.e. the gating signal modelled as a masking stimulus) cannot explain the present results, so more complex models are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7813639     DOI: 10.1007/bf00227283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Modulation of cutaneous cortical evoked potentials during isometric and isotonic contractions in the monkey.

Authors:  W Jiang; Y Lamarre; C E Chapman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1990-12-17       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Human tactile pattern recognition: active versus passive touch, velocity effects, and patterns of confusion.

Authors:  F Vega-Bermudez; K O Johnson; S S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Spatial factors in the perceived intensity of vibrotactile patterns.

Authors:  R W Cholewiak
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1979-06

4.  Reduction in perceived intensity of cutaneous stimuli during movement: a quantitative study.

Authors:  R J Milne; A M Aniss; N E Kay; S C Gandevia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  [Changes in the perception of a somesthesic stimulus during a voluntary movement].

Authors:  J M Coquery; M Coulmance
Journal:  C R Seances Soc Biol Fil       Date:  1971

6.  Elevation of visual threshold by displacement of retinal image.

Authors:  D M Mackay
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Velocity-dependent suppression of cutaneous sensitivity during movement.

Authors:  R W Angel; R C Malenka
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 5.330

8.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

9.  Saccadic suppression: elevation of visual threshold associated with saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  B L Zuber; L Stark
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 5.330

10.  The effects of cross-modal manipulations of attention on the detection of vibrotactile stimuli in humans.

Authors:  L J Post; C E Chapman
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.111

View more
  16 in total

1.  Movement-related modulation of vibrotactile detection thresholds in the human orofacial system.

Authors:  Richard D Andreatta; Steven M Barlow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Low-level static lip force control does not alter vibrotactile detection thresholds in the human orofacial system.

Authors:  Richard D Andreatta; Jason H Davidow; Amy T Scott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Haptic localizations for onset and offset of vibro-tactile stimuli are dissociated.

Authors:  Junji Watanabe; Masashi Nakatani; Hideyuki Ando; Susumu Tachi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A critical speed for gating of tactile detection during voluntary movement.

Authors:  Anita Cybulska-Klosowicz; El-Mehdi Meftah; Mélissa Raby; Marie-Line Lemieux; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Haptic localization and the internal representation of the hand in space.

Authors:  P Dassonville
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Gating of sensation and evoked potentials following foot stimulation during human gait.

Authors:  J Duysens; A A Tax; S Nawijn; W Berger; T Prokop; E Altenmüller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  A two alternative forced choice method for assessing vibrotactile discrimination thresholds in the lower limb.

Authors:  Riccardo Iandolo; Marta Carè; Valay A Shah; Simona Schiavi; Giulia Bommarito; Giacomo Boffa; Psiche Giannoni; Matilde Inglese; Leigh Ann Mrotek; Robert A Scheidt; Maura Casadio
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 1.111

8.  Enhancement of response times to bi- and tri-modal sensory stimuli during active movements.

Authors:  David Hecht; Miriam Reiner; Avi Karni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Voice-related modulation of mechanosensory detection thresholds in the human larynx.

Authors:  Michael J Hammer; Mallory A Krueger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Motor commands induce time compression for tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Alice Tomassini; Monica Gori; Gabriel Baud-Bovy; Giulio Sandini; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.