Literature DB >> 7812276

Individual quality of life in the healthy elderly.

J P Browne1, C A O'Boyle, H M McGee, C R Joyce, N J McDonald, K O'Malley, B Hiltbrunner.   

Abstract

Quality of life research with the elderly has usually focused on the impact of decline in function, and used a pre-determined model of quality of life in old age. The Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life (SEIQoL) allows individuals to nominate, weigh and assess those domains of greatest relevance to their quality of life. The SEIQoL was administered to 56 healthy elderly community residents at baseline and 12 months later. Quality of life levels were significantly higher at baseline (t = -2.04; p = 0.04) than that of a previously studied sample of healthy adults below 65 years of age, and did not change significantly over the study period. The domains nominated by both samples as relevant to their quality of life differed notably. Health status was not correlated with the perceived importance of health at baseline, and showed only a low correlation (r = 0.27) at 12 months. The weight placed on health did not increase over the study period despite a significant decline in health status. The value of allowing the individual to define personal quality of life values in a research context is explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7812276     DOI: 10.1007/bf00434897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  25 in total

Review 1.  The many faces of human ageing: toward a psychological culture of old age.

Authors:  P B Baltes
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 7.723

2.  Trends in the incidence of myocardial infarction and in associated mortality and morbidity in a large employed population, 1957-1983.

Authors:  S Pell; W E Fayerweather
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists.

Authors:  S M Hunt; J McEwen; S P McKenna
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1985-04

4.  Quality of life in chronic diseases: perceptions of elderly patients.

Authors:  R A Pearlman; R F Uhlmann
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1988-03

5.  Stability of life satisfaction in late life.

Authors:  P A Baur; M A Okun
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1983-06

6.  Longitudinal analyses of psychological well-being in a national sample: stability of mean levels.

Authors:  P T Costa; A B Zonderman; R R McCrae; J Cornoni-Huntley; B Z Locke; H E Barbano
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1987-01

Review 7.  Methodologic issues in assessing the quality of life of cancer patients.

Authors:  N K Aaronson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement.

Authors:  C A O'Boyle; H McGee; A Hickey; K O'Malley; C R Joyce
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-05-02       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Life satisfaction and quality of life among disabled elderly adults.

Authors:  J S Osberg; G E McGinnis; G DeJong; M L Seward
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1987-03

10.  The quality of life: design and evaluation of a self-assessment instrument for use with cancer patients.

Authors:  S Holmes; J Dickerson
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 5.837

View more
  48 in total

Review 1.  Subjective outcome measurement--a primer.

Authors:  M P Tully; J A Cantrill
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-06

2.  Quality of life, subjective well-being, and religiosity in Muslim college students.

Authors:  Ahmed M Abdel-Khalek
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Assessing individual quality of life in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  S Clarke; A Hickey; C O'Boyle; O Hardiman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Do the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF measure the same constructs? Evidence from the Taiwan population*.

Authors:  I-Chan Huang; Albert W Wu; Constantine Frangakis
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  The use, feasibility and psychometric properties of an individualised quality-of-life instrument: a systematic review of the SEIQoL-DW.

Authors:  L Wettergren; A Kettis-Lindblad; M Sprangers; L Ring
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Positive-negative evaluation (PNE) scale: a new dimension of the subjective domains of quality of life measure.

Authors:  M Amir; D Bar-On; R Penso
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Quality of life in elderly subjects with pain in the hip or knee.

Authors:  M Hopman-Rock; F W Kraaimaat; J W Bijlsma
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Development of a direct weighting procedure for quality of life domains.

Authors:  J P Browne; C A O'Boyle; H M McGee; N J McDonald; C R Joyce
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Components and determinants of quality of life in community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Pablo Martinez-Martin; Maria-Eugenia Prieto-Flores; Maria João Forjaz; Gloria Fernandez-Mayoralas; Fermina Rojo-Perez; Jose-Manuel Rojo; Alba Ayala
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2012-05-24

10.  Health-related quality of life, and its determinants, among older people in rural Vietnam.

Authors:  Le V Hoi; Nguyen Tk Chuc; Lars Lindholm
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.