Literature DB >> 8901369

Positive-negative evaluation (PNE) scale: a new dimension of the subjective domains of quality of life measure.

M Amir1, D Bar-On, R Penso.   

Abstract

A new subjective measure of Quality of Life (QOL), the Subjective Domains of Quality of Life Measure (SDQLM), developed by Bar-On and Amir, is a qualitative and quantitative self-structured method shown to have internal reliability and construct validity compared with quantitative pre-structured measures and evaluations by spouses and physicians. To earlier analyses on a sample of male hypertensives and normotensives, we added a content analysis which is reported here, in which the elicited QOL domains were assessed according to whether the respondent evaluated his QOL domains as positive, negative or neutral/mixed. The content analysis showed that respondents may be classified on a continuous scale from stable positive to stable negative evaluations of their QOL domains (before-after measurement). The scale was assembled by ordinal ranging of the answers at two points in time (one year apart). A respondent who evaluated his domain as positive at both such points was ranked highest on the scale, negative at both points the lowest and the two remaining possibilities constituted the middle range. Analysis of the data showed that the SDQLM with this additional content analysis correlated significantly with depression scale scores, sexual functioning, physical fitness, work satisfaction, quality of sleep, hardiness, education and age, as well as individual self-rating of QOL. The subjective measure based on self-elicited domains with PNE was shown to be an important construct compared with pre-structured measures of QOL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8901369     DOI: 10.1007/bf00435971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  21 in total

1.  Underload and overload in working life: outline of a multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  M Frankenhaeuser; B Gardell
Journal:  J Human Stress       Date:  1976-09

2.  Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists.

Authors:  S M Hunt; J McEwen; S P McKenna
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1985-04

Review 3.  Evaluating the impact of medical treatment on the quality of life: a 5-year update.

Authors:  J G Hollandsworth
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Quality of life in chronic diseases: perceptions of elderly patients.

Authors:  R A Pearlman; R F Uhlmann
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1988-03

Review 5.  Subjective well-being.

Authors:  E Diener
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Reliability of the depression adjective check lists.

Authors:  B Lubin; P Himelstein
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1976-12

7.  The Social Readjustment Rating Scale.

Authors:  T H Holmes; R H Rahe
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life.

Authors:  S H Croog; S Levine; M A Testa; B Brown; C J Bulpitt; C D Jenkins; G L Klerman; G H Williams
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of isradipine and methyldopa as monotherapy or in combination with captopril in the treatment of hypertension. The LOMIR-MCT-IH Research Group.

Authors:  Y Yodfat; N Cristal
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.689

10.  Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement.

Authors:  C A O'Boyle; H McGee; A Hickey; K O'Malley; C R Joyce
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-05-02       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Questionnaires to measure sexual quality of life.

Authors:  Renata Arrington; Joseph Cofrancesco; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  How well do elderly people complete individualised quality of life measures: an exploratory study.

Authors:  M Dempster; M Donnelly
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The proxy problem: child report versus parent report in health-related quality of life research.

Authors:  N C Theunissen; T G Vogels; H M Koopman; G H Verrips; K A Zwinderman; S P Verloove-Vanhorick; J M Wit
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.147

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.