Literature DB >> 7807190

A critique of the role of the blood-brain barrier in the chemotherapy of human brain tumors.

D J Stewart1.   

Abstract

There is general agreement that most chemotherapy agents achieve only relatively low concentrations in the normal central nervous system, that the blood-brain barrier is variably disrupted in malignant brain tumors, and that the concentration of chemotherapy drugs in the brain adjacent to tumor is intermediate between concentrations achieved in brain tumors vs normal brain. However, there is substantial controversy regarding the role of the blood-brain barrier in resistance to chemotherapy of intracerebral tumors. Many chemotherapy agents achieve concentrations in brain tumors that are comparable to those in extracerebral tumors, and drugs that cross the intact blood-brain barrier only poorly may be active against intracerebral tumors. Furthermore, the hypothesis that the brain is a pharmacological sanctuary where metastases may grow while tumor is responding in other parts of the body may be flawed: there are only 2 or 3 types of malignancies (out of all those that are sensitive to chemotherapy) in which the risk of isolated central nervous system relapse is moderately high, and even in these 2 or 3, effective central nervous system prophylaxis has minimal or no impact on overall survival. Furthermore, drugs that cross the BBB do not appear to be more effective than other drugs at reducing the risk of brain metastases, and brain metastases at the time of diagnosis do not necessarily convey a worse prognosis than metastases to various other sites. While average drug concentrations in brain adjacent to tumor are lower than those within brain tumors, very small numbers of tumor cells may be capable of inducing local leakiness in blood vessels, and there is little information on drug concentrations achieved in individual tumor cells within the brain adjacent to tumor. Furthermore, any limitation of uptake of drugs into brain tumors could be at least partially due to increased tissue pressure within tumors rather than being due to blood-brain barrier phenomena. This distinction could be important, since strategies that one might use to increase drug delivery to brain tumors might differ depending on whether the reduced delivery were due to barrier phenomena vs blood flow phenomena. The role of the blood-brain barrier in resistance of intracerebral tumors to chemotherapy remains unclear: while it may well play some role (and perhaps even a major one), self-fulfilling prophecies and unintentional bias in data selection and interpretation may have previously made it appear more important than it actually is.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7807190     DOI: 10.1007/bf01052723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  161 in total

1.  Review of selected experimental brain tumor models used in chemotherapy experiments.

Authors:  P C Merker; I Wodinsky; R I Geran
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1975 Jul-Aug

2.  Proceedings: 4'-Demethyl-epipodophyllotoxin-beta-D-thenylidene-glucoside (PTG) in the treatment of malignant intracranial neoplasms.

Authors:  B D Sklansky; R S Mann-Kaplan; A F Reynolds; M L Rosenblum; M D Walker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The effects of mannitol on blood viscosity.

Authors:  A M Burke; D O Quest; S Chien; C Cerri
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Permeability characteristics of brain adjacent to tumors in rats.

Authors:  V A Levin; M Freeman-Dove; H D Landahl
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1975-12

5.  Natural history of central nervous system acute leukemia in adults.

Authors:  D J Stewart; M J Keating; K B McCredie; T L Smith; E Youness; S G Murphy; G P Bodey; E J Freireich
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Interstitial pressure gradients in tissue-isolated and subcutaneous tumors: implications for therapy.

Authors:  Y Boucher; L T Baxter; R K Jain
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  A phase II study of cisplatin therapy in recurrent childhood brain tumors. A report from the Childrens Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  S J Bertolone; E S Baum; W Krivit; G D Hammond
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  High-dose cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for recurrent CNS tumors in children.

Authors:  J C Allen; L Helson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Penetration of 3-deazauridine into human brain, intracerebral tumor, and cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  D J Stewart; J A Benvenuto; M Leavens; S W Hall; R S Benjamin; W Plunkett; K B McCredie; M A Burgess; T L Loo
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  A prognostic-factor risk index in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with cisplatin-containing combination chemotherapy.

Authors:  T Shinkai; K Eguchi; Y Sasaki; T Tamura; Y Ohe; A Kojima; F Oshita; T Miya; H Okamoto; K Iemura
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Overcoming the blood-brain barrier in chemotherapy treatment of pediatric brain tumors.

Authors:  Linfeng Wu; Xiaoxun Li; Dileep R Janagam; Tao L Lowe
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Drug delivery to melanoma brain metastases: Can current challenges lead to new opportunities?

Authors:  Gautham Gampa; Shruthi Vaidhyanathan; Jann N Sarkaria; William F Elmquist
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 7.658

Review 3.  Brain metastasis: new opportunities to tackle therapeutic resistance.

Authors:  Joan Seoane; Leticia De Mattos-Arruda
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  Local interstitial delivery of z-butylidenephthalide by polymer wafers against malignant human gliomas.

Authors:  Horng-Jyh Harn; Shinn-Zong Lin; Po-Cheng Lin; Cyong-Yue Liu; Po-Yen Liu; Li-Fu Chang; Ssu-Yin Yen; Dean-Kuo Hsieh; Fu-Chen Liu; Dar-Fu Tai; Tzyy-Wen Chiou
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  The oligometastatic state - separating truth from wishful thinking.

Authors:  David A Palma; Joseph K Salama; Simon S Lo; Suresh Senan; Tom Treasure; Ramaswamy Govindan; Ralph Weichselbaum
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Systemic therapy for brain metastases.

Authors:  Jonathan W Rick; Maryam Shahin; Ankush Chandra; Cecilia Dalle Ore; John K Yue; Alan Nguyen; Garima Yagnik; Soumya Sagar; Saman Arfaie; Manish K Aghi
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 7.  Translational and basic science opportunities in palliative care and radiation oncology.

Authors:  Mai Anh Huynh; Alexander Spektor
Journal:  Ann Palliat Med       Date:  2019-07

8.  RMP-7 : Potential as an Adjuvant to the Drug Treatment of Brain Tumours.

Authors:  A V Boddy; H D Thomas
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.749

9.  Response of brain metastases from breast cancer to megestrol acetate: a case report.

Authors:  D J Stewart; S Dahrouge
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 10.  The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with brain metastases from solid tumors.

Authors:  Tobias Walbert; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.