Literature DB >> 28634084

Drug delivery to melanoma brain metastases: Can current challenges lead to new opportunities?

Gautham Gampa1, Shruthi Vaidhyanathan1, Jann N Sarkaria2, William F Elmquist3.   

Abstract

Melanoma has a high propensity to metastasize to the brain, and patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) have an extremely poor prognosis. The recent approval of several molecularly-targeted agents (e.g., BRAF, MEK inhibitors) and biologics (anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies) has brought new hope to patients suffering from this formerly untreatable and lethal disease. Importantly, there have been recent reports of success in some clinical studies examining the efficacy of both targeted agents and immunotherapies that show similar response rates in both brain metastases and extracranial disease. While these studies are encouraging, there remains significant room for improvement in the treatment of MBM, given the lack of durable response and the development of resistance to current therapies. Critical questions remain regarding mechanisms that lead to this lack of durable response and development of resistance, and how those mechanisms may differ in systemic sites versus brain metastases. One issue that may not be fully appreciated is that the delivery of several small molecule molecularly-targeted therapies to the brain is often restricted due to active efflux at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) interface. Inadequate local drug concentrations may be partially responsible for the development of unique patterns of resistance at metastatic sites in the brain. It is clear that there can be local, heterogeneous BBB breakdown in MBM, as exemplified by contrast-enhancement on T1-weighted MR imaging. However, it is possible that the successful treatment of MBM with small molecule targeted therapies will depend, in part, on the ability of these therapies to penetrate an intact BBB and reach the protected micro-metastases (so called "sub-clinical" disease) that escape early detection by contrast-enhanced MRI, as well as regions of tumor within MRI-detectable metastases that may have a less compromised BBB. The emergence of resistance in MBM may be related to several diverse, yet interrelated, factors including the distinct microenvironment of the brain and inadequate brain penetration of targeted therapies to specific regions of tumor. The tumor microenvironment has been ascribed to play a key role in steering the course of disease progression, by dictating changes in expression of tumor drivers and resistance-related signaling mechanisms. Therefore, a key issue to consider is how changes in drug delivery, and hence local drug concentrations within a metastatic microenvironment, will influence the development of resistance. Herein we discuss our perspective on several critical questions that focus on many aspects relevant to the treatment of melanoma brain metastases; the answers to which may lead to important advances in the treatment of this devastating disease.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active efflux; Blood-brain barrier; Drug delivery; Drug resistance; Melanoma brain metastases; Molecularly-targeted agents

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28634084      PMCID: PMC5565722          DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Res        ISSN: 1043-6618            Impact factor:   7.658


  96 in total

Review 1.  Improving drug delivery to primary and metastatic brain tumors: strategies to overcome the blood-brain barrier.

Authors:  K E Parrish; J N Sarkaria; W F Elmquist
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  A model for personalized in vivo analysis of human immune responsiveness.

Authors:  Hannes Kalscheuer; Nichole Danzl; Takashi Onoe; Ted Faust; Robert Winchester; Robin Goland; Ellen Greenberg; Thomas R Spitzer; David G Savage; Hiroyuki Tahara; Goda Choi; Yong-Guang Yang; Megan Sykes
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  PI3K Pathway Inhibition Achieves Potent Antitumor Activity in Melanoma Brain Metastases In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Heike Niessner; Jennifer Schmitz; Ghazaleh Tabatabai; Andreas M Schmid; Carsten Calaminus; Tobias Sinnberg; Benjamin Weide; Thomas K Eigentler; Claus Garbe; Birgit Schittek; Leticia Quintanilla-Fend; Benjamin Bender; Marion Mai; Christian Praetorius; Stefan Beissert; Gabriele Schackert; Michael H Muders; Matthias Meinhardt; Gustavo B Baretton; Reinhard Dummer; Keith Flaherty; Bernd J Pichler; Dagmar Kulms; Dana Westphal; Friedegund Meier
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  Mouse models of advanced spontaneous metastasis for experimental therapeutics.

Authors:  Giulio Francia; William Cruz-Munoz; Shan Man; Ping Xu; Robert S Kerbel
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  β1-integrin: a potential therapeutic target in the battle against cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Dalit Barkan; Ann F Chambers
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Prognostic factors for survival in melanoma patients with brain metastases.

Authors:  Michael A Davies; Ping Liu; Susan McIntyre; Kevin B Kim; Nicholas Papadopoulos; Wen-Jen Hwu; Patrick Hwu; Agop Bedikian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  The blood-brain barrier: its influence in the treatment of brain tumors metastases.

Authors:  D Fortin
Journal:  Curr Cancer Drug Targets       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.428

8.  Vemurafenib in patients with BRAF(V600) mutation-positive melanoma with symptomatic brain metastases: final results of an open-label pilot study.

Authors:  Reinhard Dummer; Simone M Goldinger; Christian P Turtschi; Nina B Eggmann; Olivier Michielin; Lada Mitchell; Luisa Veronese; Paul René Hilfiker; Lea Felderer; Jeannine D Rinderknecht
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Determinants of outcome in melanoma patients with cerebral metastases.

Authors:  K M Fife; M H Colman; G N Stevens; I C Firth; D Moon; K F Shannon; R Harman; K Petersen-Schaefer; A C Zacest; M Besser; G W Milton; W H McCarthy; J F Thompson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Animal models of disease: pre-clinical animal models of cancer and their applications and utility in drug discovery.

Authors:  Bruce A Ruggeri; Faye Camp; Sheila Miknyoczki
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 5.858

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Improving CNS Delivery to Brain Metastases by Blood-Tumor Barrier Disruption.

Authors:  Samuel A Sprowls; Tasneem A Arsiwala; Jacob R Bumgarner; Neal Shah; Sundus S Lateef; Brooke N Kielkowski; Paul R Lockman
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2019-07-20

Review 2.  Drug Concentration Asymmetry in Tissues and Plasma for Small Molecule-Related Therapeutic Modalities.

Authors:  Donglu Zhang; Cornelis E C A Hop; Gabriela Patilea-Vrana; Gautham Gampa; Herana Kamal Seneviratne; Jashvant D Unadkat; Jane R Kenny; Karthik Nagapudi; Li Di; Lian Zhou; Mark Zak; Matthew R Wright; Namandjé N Bumpus; Richard Zang; Xingrong Liu; Yurong Lai; S Cyrus Khojasteh
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.922

3.  E6201, an intravenous MEK1 inhibitor, achieves an exceptional response in BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic malignant melanoma with brain metastases.

Authors:  Hani M Babiker; Sara A Byron; William P D Hendricks; William F Elmquist; Gautham Gampa; Jessica Vondrak; Jessica Aldrich; Lori Cuyugan; Jonathan Adkins; Valerie De Luca; Raoul Tibes; Mitesh J Borad; Katie Marceau; Thomas J Myers; Linda J Paradiso; Winnie S Liang; Ronald L Korn; Derek Cridebring; Daniel D Von Hoff; John D Carpten; David W Craig; Jeffrey M Trent; Michael S Gordon
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  Brain Distribution of a Novel MEK Inhibitor E6201: Implications in the Treatment of Melanoma Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Gautham Gampa; Minjee Kim; Nicholas Cook-Rostie; Janice K Laramy; Jann N Sarkaria; Linda Paradiso; Louis DePalatis; William F Elmquist
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 5.  Barriers to Effective Drug Treatment for Brain Metastases: A Multifactorial Problem in the Delivery of Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Minjee Kim; Sani H Kizilbash; Janice K Laramy; Gautham Gampa; Karen E Parrish; Jann N Sarkaria; William F Elmquist
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 6.  Deciphering mechanisms of brain metastasis in melanoma - the gist of the matter.

Authors:  Torben Redmer
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 27.401

Review 7.  Ultrasound-mediated disruption of the blood tumor barrier for improved therapeutic delivery.

Authors:  T A Arsiwala; S A Sprowls; K E Blethen; C E Adkins; P A Saralkar; R A Fladeland; W Pentz; A Gabriele; B Kielkowski; R I Mehta; P Wang; J S Carpenter; M Ranjan; U Najib; A R Rezai; P R Lockman
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 6.218

8.  Anti-Metastatic Effects on Melanoma via Intravenous Administration of Anti-NF-κB siRNA Complexed with Functional Peptide-Modified Nano-Micelles.

Authors:  Hisako Ibaraki; Takanori Kanazawa; Minami Owada; Keiko Iwaya; Yuuki Takashima; Yasuo Seta
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 6.321

9.  Assessment of Effectiveness and Safety of Osimertinib for Patients With Intracranial Metastatic Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anders W Erickson; Priscilla K Brastianos; Sunit Das
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-03-02

10.  Enhancing Brain Retention of a KIF11 Inhibitor Significantly Improves its Efficacy in a Mouse Model of Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Gautham Gampa; Rajappa S Kenchappa; Afroz S Mohammad; Karen E Parrish; Minjee Kim; James F Crish; Amanda Luu; Rita West; Alfredo Quinones Hinojosa; Jann N Sarkaria; Steven S Rosenfeld; William F Elmquist
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.