Literature DB >> 7806865

Nurses' hand decontamination practice: results of a local study.

D Gould1.   

Abstract

Cross-infection in hospital occurs mainly via hands. Hand washing is the most effective means of prevention, yet it has been reported that hands are washed too seldom, often inappropriately and that technique is poor. However, these claims are often made without explaining precisely how data were collected. This study employed more rigorous criteria than earlier research to judge the appropriateness and technique of nurses' hand contamination. During the 2 h that they were observed nurses decontaminated hands after 28.7% patient contacts. The data were then reanalysed so that only those activities likely to result in heavy contamination were examined. This revealed that such 'essential' decontaminations were performed on 49.8% occasions. Differences were found between hospitals related to the availability of hand decontaminating agents, particularly when nursing workload became high. A scoring system to assess technique was developed for the study. Mean score was 8.6 out of 12. Technique was superior for nurses employed in intensive care units regardless of the hospital in which data were collected (P < 0.0001). Nurses' knowledge of infection control was poor, but those with more knowledge decontaminated hands more appropriately (P < 0.004), although they did not have a better technique. It is recommended that future research move beyond mere description, with its inevitable conclusion that clinical staff should improve performance, turning toward the identification of local barriers to effective practice. This could be followed by improvement in resources and educational intervention should these emerge as problematic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7806865     DOI: 10.1016/0195-6701(94)90149-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  6 in total

Review 1.  The health professional's role in preventing nosocomial infections.

Authors:  H Saloojee; A Steenhoff
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Contextual and Psychosocial Determinants of Effective Handwashing Technique: Recommendations for Interventions from a Case Study in Harare, Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Max N D Friedrich; Marc E Binkert; Hans-Joachim Mosler
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Patient perspective: is hand hygiene really the most important thing we do?

Authors:  Dinah Gould
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2014-02-11

Review 4.  Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Axel Kramer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Efficacy of handrubbing with alcohol based solution versus standard handwashing with antiseptic soap: randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Girou; Sabrina Loyeau; Patrick Legrand; Françoise Oppein; Christian Brun-Buisson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-08-17

6.  Moving beyond hand hygiene monitoring as a marker of infection prevention performance: Development of a tailored infection control continuous quality improvement tool.

Authors:  Annette Jeanes; Pietro G Coen; Nicolas S Drey; Dinah J Gould
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 2.918

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.