Literature DB >> 15489352

Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs.

Günter Kampf1, Axel Kramer.   

Abstract

The etiology of nosocomial infections, the frequency of contaminated hands with the different nosocomial pathogens, and the role of health care workers' hands during outbreaks suggest that a hand hygiene preparation should at least have activity against bacteria, yeasts, and coated viruses. The importance of efficacy in choosing the right hand hygiene product is reflected in the new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline on hand hygiene (J. M. Boyce and D. Pittet, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 51:1-45, 2002). The best antimicrobial efficacy can be achieved with ethanol (60 to 85%), isopropanol (60 to 80%), and n-propanol (60 to 80%). The activity is broad and immediate. Ethanol at high concentrations (e.g., 95%) is the most effective treatment against naked viruses, whereas n-propanol seems to be more effective against the resident bacterial flora. The combination of alcohols may have a synergistic effect. The antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine (2 to 4%) and triclosan (1 to 2%) is both lower and slower. Additionally, both agents have a risk of bacterial resistance, which is higher for chlorhexidine than triclosan. Their activity is often supported by the mechanical removal of pathogens during hand washing. Taking the antimicrobial efficacy and the mechanical removal together, they are still less effective than the alcohols. Plain soap and water has the lowest efficacy of all. In the new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline, promotion of alcohol-based hand rubs containing various emollients instead of irritating soaps and detergents is one strategy to reduce skin damage, dryness, and irritation. Irritant contact dermatitis is highest with preparations containing 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, less frequent with nonantimicrobial soaps and preparations containing lower concentrations of chlorhexidine gluconate, and lowest with well-formulated alcohol-based hand rubs containing emollients and other skin conditioners. Too few published data from comparative trials are available to reliably rank triclosan. Personnel should be reminded that it is neither necessary nor recommended to routinely wash hands after each application of an alcohol-based hand rub. Long-lasting improvement of compliance with hand hygiene protocols can be successful if an effective and accessible alcohol-based hand rub with a proven dermal tolerance and an excellent user acceptability is supplied, accompanied by education of health care workers and promotion of the use of the product.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15489352      PMCID: PMC523567          DOI: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.863-893.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev        ISSN: 0893-8512            Impact factor:   26.132


  554 in total

1.  Chlorhexidine anaphylaxis: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  B A Knight; R Puy; J Douglass; R E O'Hehir; F Thien
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.048

2.  Acute anaphylaxis due to topical chlorhexidine acetate.

Authors:  R J Evans
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-03-14

Review 3.  Hand antiseptics: rubs versus scrubs, alcoholic solutions versus alcoholic gels.

Authors:  H Pietsch
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Hand washing with soap reduces diarrhoea and spread of bacterial pathogens in a Bangladesh village.

Authors:  N S Shahid; W B Greenough; A R Samadi; M I Huq; N Rahman
Journal:  J Diarrhoeal Dis Res       Date:  1996-06

5.  [Inactivation of chlorhexidine for in vitro testing of disinfectants].

Authors:  G Kampf; M Höfer; H Rüden
Journal:  Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed       Date:  1998-02

6.  The resistance of urinary tract pathogens to chlorhexidine bladder washouts.

Authors:  D J Stickler; C L Clayton; J C Chawla
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  [Etiology of hospital-acquired infections in Spanish hospitals (EPINE, 1990-1999)].

Authors:  Angel Asensio; Rafael Cantón; Josep Vaqué; José Rosselló; José Luis Arribas
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  2002-05-25       Impact factor: 1.725

8.  Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase (FabI): a target for the antimicrobial triclosan and its role in acylated homoserine lactone synthesis.

Authors:  T T Hoang; H P Schweizer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Serratia marcescens contamination of antiseptic soap containing triclosan: implications for nosocomial infection.

Authors:  M A Barry; D E Craven; T A Goularte; D A Lichtenberg
Journal:  Infect Control       Date:  1984-09

10.  Serratia marcescens outbreak in a paediatric oncology unit traced to contaminated chlorhexidine.

Authors:  T A McAllister; C E Lucas; H Mocan; R H Liddell; B E Gibson; I M Hann; D J Platt
Journal:  Scott Med J       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 0.729

View more
  142 in total

1.  Economic value of dispensing home-based preoperative chlorhexidine bathing cloths to prevent surgical site infection.

Authors:  Rachel R Bailey; Dianna R Stuckey; Bryan A Norman; Andrew P Duggan; Kristina M Bacon; Diana L Connor; Ingi Lee; Robert R Muder; Bruce Y Lee
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  Effects of Formulation on Microbicide Potency and Mitigation of the Development of Bacterial Insusceptibility.

Authors:  Nicola L Cowley; Sarah Forbes; Alejandro Amézquita; Peter McClure; Gavin J Humphreys; Andrew J McBain
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Fluorescence assay for evaluating microbicidal activity of hand antiseptics.

Authors:  Rosa M Lopez-Gigosos; Alberto Mariscal; Eloisa Mariscal-Lopez; Mario Gutierrez-Bedmar; Joaquin Fernandez
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Topical Antimicrobial Treatments Can Elicit Shifts to Resident Skin Bacterial Communities and Reduce Colonization by Staphylococcus aureus Competitors.

Authors:  Adam J SanMiguel; Jacquelyn S Meisel; Joseph Horwinski; Qi Zheng; Elizabeth A Grice
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Evaluation of two methods of determining the efficacies of two alcohol-based hand rubs for surgical hand antisepsis.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Christiane Ostermeyer; Peter Heeg; Daryl Paulson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Influence of applied volume on efficacy of 3-minute surgical reference disinfection method prEN 12791.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Christiane Ostermeyer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Life-threatening anaphylactic shock due to chlorhexidine on the central venous catheter: a case series.

Authors:  Meilin Weng; Minmin Zhu; Wankun Chen; Changhong Miao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

8.  Alcohol dehydrogenase restricts the ability of the pathogen Candida albicans to form a biofilm on catheter surfaces through an ethanol-based mechanism.

Authors:  Pranab K Mukherjee; Sotohy Mohamed; Jyotsna Chandra; Duncan Kuhn; Shuqing Liu; Omar S Antar; Ryan Munyon; Aaron P Mitchell; David Andes; Mark R Chance; Mahmoud Rouabhia; Mahmoud A Ghannoum
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Detection of benzalkonium chloride resistance in community environmental isolates of staphylococci.

Authors:  Gui-Xin He; Michael Landry; Huizhong Chen; Conner Thorpe; Dennis Walsh; Manuel F Varela; Hongmiao Pan
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  Antiseptic Agents Elicit Short-Term, Personalized, and Body Site-Specific Shifts in Resident Skin Bacterial Communities.

Authors:  Adam J SanMiguel; Jacquelyn S Meisel; Joseph Horwinski; Qi Zheng; Charles W Bradley; Elizabeth A Grice
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 8.551

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.