Literature DB >> 7806479

Chirp evoked otoacoustic emissions.

J Neumann1, S Uppenkamp, B Kollmeier.   

Abstract

The principles of short frequency sweeps (chirps) and their application to evoke transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) are developed in comparison to using standard click stimuli. In contrast to click stimuli, chirp signals have the advantage of stimulating a freely selectable frequency range. In addition, chirp signals contain more energy than a click stimulus with the same maximum amplitude. The effects of different stimuli on TEOAE were investigated in normal hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Using wide-band chirp signals yields a better signal-to-noise ratio compared to click stimulation. In addition, the stimulation of selected regions of the basilar membrane with frequency-limited chirps evokes TEOAE with frequency components that lie within the stimulated frequency range. The characteristic fine structure of this spectrum was found to be independent of the stimulus applied. The utilization of chirp stimuli appears to be useful for evoking TEOAE in, e.g., clinical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7806479     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90123-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  12 in total

1.  The middle ear muscle reflex in the diagnosis of cochlear neuropathy.

Authors:  Michelle D Valero; Kenneth E Hancock; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  High frequency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission measurements using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Chelsea M Blankenship; Angela C Garinis; Daniel B Putterman; Marcin Wróblewski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Chirp-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and Middle Ear Absorbance for Monitoring Ototoxicity in Cystic Fibrosis Patients.

Authors:  Angela C Garinis; Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Daniel B Putterman; Garnett P McMillan; Jeffrey A Gold; M Patrick Feeney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Comparisons of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Signal-to-noise ratio improvement of swept-tone-generated transient otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher L Bennett; Todor Mihajloski; Özcan Özdamar
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Effects of cochlear synaptopathy on middle-ear muscle reflexes in unanesthetized mice.

Authors:  Michelle D Valero; Kenneth E Hancock; Stéphane F Maison; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  Otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  M Richardson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.

Authors:  Daniel B Putterman; Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; Angela C Garinis; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Garnett P McMillan; M Patrick Feeney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Variable-rate frequency sweeps and their application to the measurement of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Anders T Christensen; Carolina Abdala; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.482

10.  Peripheral Auditory Involvement in Childhood Listening Difficulty.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Chelsea M Blankenship; Li Lin; Nicholette T Sloat; Audrey Perdew; Hannah Stewart; David R Moore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.