Literature DB >> 27106751

Signal-to-noise ratio improvement of swept-tone-generated transient otoacoustic emissions.

Christopher L Bennett1, Todor Mihajloski2, Özcan Özdamar2.   

Abstract

In this study, we utilized the swept-tone (ST) deconvolution method for comparing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) characteristics of ST otoacoustic emissions (OAE) to conventionally acquired click, or transient-evoked (TE), OAE. We generated a hearing-level equalized (HLeq) ST stimulus based on normative loudness metrics at the different frequencies present in the ST. Due to noise-shaping properties of the ST deconvolution method, we anticipated a theoretical SNR gain of +4.26 dB in STOAE compared to TEOAE acquired under comparable settings. This prediction was confirmed by computer simulation. HLeq STOAE and TEOAE were then acquired from each of the 22 ears that were tested at five stimulation levels from 5 to 45 dB HL, and analyzed responses in terms of their overall SNR. We found that the overall SNR of the HLeq STOAE responses at stimulation levels at or above 15 dB HL was significantly higher than that of TEOAE by an average of +3.6 dB. Importantly, this leads to recording quality and time-saving improvements in clinical hearing screenings.

Keywords:  Deconvolution; Otoacoustic emission; Signal-to-noise ratio; Swept-tone

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27106751     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-016-1507-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  24 in total

1.  Auditory brainstem responses with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar-membrane dispersion.

Authors:  T Dau; O Wegner; V Mellert; B Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Modification of the wavelet method used in transiently evoked otoacoustic emission pass/fail criterion to increase its accuracy.

Authors:  L P Yang; S T Young; T S Ku
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Principal component analysis as a method to facilitate fast detection of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Paolo Ravazzani; Gabriella Tognola; Marta Parazzini; Ferdinando Grandori
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Hearing level equalized otoacoustic emissions acquired by swept-tones: intensity characteristics.

Authors:  Todor Mihajloski; Magdalena Lachowska; Christopher L Bennett; Ozcan Ozdamar
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

5.  Swept-tone transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher L Bennett; Özcan Özdamar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Comparing stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured by compression, suppression, and spectral smoothing.

Authors:  Radha Kalluri; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Clinical applications of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  B L Lonsbury-Martin; M L Whitehead; G K Martin
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-10

8.  Temporal suppression and augmentation of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; James M Harte; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Measuring stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions using swept tones.

Authors:  Radha Kalluri; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Chirp evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  J Neumann; S Uppenkamp; B Kollmeier
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  1 in total

1.  Variable-rate frequency sweeps and their application to the measurement of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Anders T Christensen; Carolina Abdala; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.482

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.