Literature DB >> 7804919

Basic statistics for clinicians: 1. Hypothesis testing.

G Guyatt1, R Jaeschke, N Heddle, D Cook, H Shannon, S Walter.   

Abstract

In the first of a series of four articles the authors explain the statistical concepts of hypothesis testing and p values. In many clinical trials investigators test a null hypothesis that there is no difference between a new treatment and a placebo or between two treatments. The result of a single experiment will almost always show some difference between the experimental and the control groups. Is the difference due to chance, or is it large enough to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a true difference in treatment effects? Statistical tests yield a p value: the probability that the experiment would show a difference as great or greater than that observed if the null hypothesis were true. By convention, p values of less than 0.05 are considered statistically significant, and investigators conclude that there is a real difference. However, the smaller the sample size, the greater the chance of erroneously concluding that the experimental treatment does not differ from the control--in statistical terms, the power of the test may be inadequate. Tests of several outcomes from one set of data may lead to an erroneous conclusion that an outcome is significant if the joint probability of the outcomes is not taken into account. Hypothesis testing has limitations, which will be discussed in the next article in the series.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7804919      PMCID: PMC1337490     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  15 in total

1.  Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-11-04       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Methodological standards for assessing therapeutic equivalence.

Authors:  B Kirshner
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  A comparison of enalapril with hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate in the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure.

Authors:  J N Cohn; G Johnson; S Ziesche; F Cobb; G Francis; F Tristani; R Smith; W B Dunkman; H Loeb; M Wong
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The analysis of multiple endpoints in clinical trials.

Authors:  S J Pocock; N L Geller; A A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. A survey of three medical journals.

Authors:  S J Pocock; M D Hughes; R J Lee
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-08-13       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Statistical considerations for performing multiple tests in a single experiment. 1. Introduction.

Authors:  P C O'Brien; M A Shampo
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Estimating with confidence.

Authors:  M J Gardner; D G Altman
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-04-30

8.  Users' guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  A D Oxman; D L Sackett; G H Guyatt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-11-03       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Users' guides to the medical literature.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D Rennie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-11-03       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Early rehabilitation after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Mayou; D MacMahon; P Sleight; M J Florencio
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981 Dec 19-26       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  18 in total

1.  The ethics of alpha: reflections on statistics, evidence and values in medicine.

Authors:  R E Upshur
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2001

2.  Creating a Data Analysis Plan: What to Consider When Choosing Statistics for a Study.

Authors:  Scot H Simpson
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

3.  The Value of the P Value.

Authors:  Dinesh Vyas; Archana Balakrishnan; Arpita Vyas
Journal:  Am J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-12

4.  Sample size matters: a guide for surgeons.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Daniel Oertli
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Designing randomized clinical trials in pediatric neurosurgery.

Authors:  Peter Kan; John R W Kestle
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  [Use of robust methods in inferential statistics].

Authors:  E Ramalle-Gómara; J M Andrés De Llano
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.137

7.  Confidence interval or p-value?: part 4 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.

Authors:  Jean-Baptist du Prel; Gerhard Hommel; Bernd Röhrig; Maria Blettner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  New evidence demonstrates that self-monitoring of blood glucose does not improve outcomes in type 2 diabetes-when this practice is not applied properly.

Authors:  David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05

9.  [Profile of biostatistics utilization in three medical reviews. Implications for medical education].

Authors:  R J Gagnon; R Marchand; M Marcil
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Statistics: a brief overview.

Authors:  Ryan Winters; Andrew Winters; Ronald G Amedee
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2010
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.