Literature DB >> 11939426

The ethics of alpha: reflections on statistics, evidence and values in medicine.

R E Upshur1.   

Abstract

As health care embraces the tenets of evidence-based medicine it is important to ask questions about how evidence is produced and interpreted. This essay explores normative dimensions of evidence production, particularly around issues of setting the tolerable level of uncertainty of results. Four specific aspects are explored: what health care providers know about statistics, why alpha levels have been set at 0.05, the role of randomization in the generation of sufficient grounds of belief, and the role of observational studies. The essay concludes with recommendations to acknowledge the value permeation of outcome measures and suggests that attention to reasoning and argument analysis can augment traditional evidence-based approaches in providing a robust critical approach to medical knowledge.

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11939426     DOI: 10.1023/a:1014462116530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth        ISSN: 1386-7415


  27 in total

Review 1.  Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests?

Authors:  J A Sterne; G Davey Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-27

2.  The two cultures of medicine: objective facts versus subjectivity and values.

Authors:  H Wulff
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Priors and prejudice.

Authors:  R E Upshur
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1999-08

Review 4.  Outcomes research and the quality of health care: the beacon of an ethics of evidence.

Authors:  V Miké
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 5.  Randomization, statistics, and causal inference.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Certainty, probability and abduction: why we should look to C.S. Peirce rather than Gödel for a theory of clinical reasoning.

Authors:  R Upshur
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Academic calculations versus clinical judgments: practicing physicians' use of quantitative measures of test accuracy.

Authors:  M C Reid; D A Lane; A R Feinstein
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 8.  Basic statistics for clinicians: 1. Hypothesis testing.

Authors:  G Guyatt; R Jaeschke; N Heddle; D Cook; H Shannon; S Walter
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  "Clinical Judgment" revisited: the distraction of quantitative models.

Authors:  A R Feinstein
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Measured enthusiasm: does the method of reporting trial results alter perceptions of therapeutic effectiveness?

Authors:  C D Naylor; E Chen; B Strauss
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-12-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  7 in total

1.  Argumentation and evidence.

Authors:  R E G Upshur; Errol Colak
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2003

Review 2.  Evidence based medicine guidelines: a solution to rationing or politics disguised as science?

Authors:  S I Saarni; H A Gylling
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Evidence, ethics, and values: a framework for health promotion.

Authors:  Stacy M Carter; Lucie Rychetnik; Beverley Lloyd; Ian H Kerridge; Louise Baur; Adrian Bauman; Claire Hooker; Avigdor Zask
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  A cost evaluation of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in the treatment of end-stage renal disease in Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Authors:  Mirhelen Mendes de Abreu; David R Walker; Ricardo C Sesso; Marcos B Ferraz
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 5.  Evidence-based medicine: classifying the evidence from clinical trials--the need to consider other dimensions.

Authors:  Rinaldo Bellomo; Sean M Bagshaw
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  In global health research, is it legitimate to stop clinical trials early on account of their opportunity costs?

Authors:  James V Lavery; Peter A Singer; Renee Ridzon; Jerome A Singh; Arthur S Slutsky; Joseph J Anisko; David Buchanan
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  The need to reform our assessment of evidence from clinical trials: a commentary.

Authors:  Sean M Bagshaw; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 2.464

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.