Literature DB >> 7802329

Comparisons of the dental arch changes in patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusions: extraction vs nonextraction treatments.

S E Bishara1, P Bayati, A R Zaher, J R Jakobsen.   

Abstract

Treatment and posttreatment changes in the dental arches of patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusions were evaluated. Half the patients (N = 46) were treated with a nonextraction approach; treatment for the other half (N = 45) included the extraction of four first premolars. The following parameters were measured in the maxillary and mandibular arches: arch width at the incisors, canines, second premolars and first permanent molars; anterior, posterior and total arch lengths; and total and anterior tooth size-arch length discrepancies. These parameters were measured pretreatment, immediately following orthodontic treatment and at least 2 years posttreatment. The findings indicate that the extraction of premolars significantly improves the discrepancy between the tooth size and arch length during treatment. Posttreatment both the extraction and nonextraction groups experienced an increase in tooth size-arch length discrepancies and a reduction in arch length. Extractions did not significantly alter the direction of the overall posttreatment trends for some parameters, e.g., intercanine width and tooth size-arch length discrepancies. On the other hand, the posttreatment trends for other parameters--such as intermolar width--were significantly different between the extraction and nonextraction groups. In general, the trends in the posttreatment changes were similar in males and females as well as in the maxillary and mandibular arches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7802329     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0351:COTDAC>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  6 in total

1.  Influence of facial growth pattern on outcome of extraction therapy.

Authors:  U Hirschfelder; O Boulouchou; D Müssig; A Fleischer-Peters
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Long term dental transversal stability of Class II division 1 treated with cervical headgear.

Authors:  Márcio Bastos de Oliveira; Jean Nunes Dos Santos; Vanessa Mascarenhas Lima; Tiago Fonseca Lima da Fonte; Telma Martins de Araujo; Carlos Jorge Vogel; Emanuel Braga Rêgo
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2022-06-10

3.  A comparison of second premolar extraction and mini-implant total arch distalization with interproximal stripping.

Authors:  Min-Ho Jung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Facial divergence and mandibular crowding in treated subjects.

Authors:  Avrum I Goldberg; R G Behrents; Donald R Oliver; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Arch width changes in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with maxillary first premolar extraction and non-extraction method.

Authors:  Sajjad Shirazi; Mojgan Kachoei; Naiemeh Shahvaghar-Asl; Samaneh Shirazi; Reza Sharghi
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2016-10-01

6.  Comparison of Tooth Widths, Arch Widths and Arch Lengths in Class-I Normal Dentition to Class-I and II Crowded Dentitions.

Authors:  Hafiza Zobia Shafique; Rumeesha Zaheer; Abdullah Jan; Ayesha Fazal
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.