Literature DB >> 33679911

Comparison of Tooth Widths, Arch Widths and Arch Lengths in Class-I Normal Dentition to Class-I and II Crowded Dentitions.

Hafiza Zobia Shafique1, Rumeesha Zaheer2, Abdullah Jan3, Ayesha Fazal4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Dental study casts play a vital role in the diagnosis and treatment planning of various orthodontic cases. This study was carried out to compare the tooth widths, arch widths, and arch lengths in Class-I normal dentition to those in Class-I and Class-II crowded dentition in an effort to improve treatment planning and to eventually reduce treatment duration.
METHODS: Total 170 patients, 12 to 40 years of age with a complete set of permanent teeth till 1st molars; who presented to the Orthodontics Department at Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry (A.F.I.D), Rawalpindi from Sep 2019 to Feb 2020, were included in the study. Non-probability purposive method of sampling was used. The dental casts obtained were used to measure tooth widths, arch widths, and arch lengths. Subjects were classified into Class-I normal and Class-I and Class-II crowded occlusion and comparison of the sum of tooth widths, arch widths, and arch length discrepancies were determined among the three occlusion groups. Data was analyzed in SPSS version 21 and independent samples t-test was used to differentiate the variables of interest.
RESULTS: Out of 170 subjects, 73 (42.9%) subjects had Class-I normal occlusion while 97 (57%) had Class-I and Class-II crowded occlusions. No statistical difference was found between the occlusal groups with regard to the sum of tooth widths, inter-canine widths, inter-first premolar widths, inter-second premolar widths and inter-molar widths. However, a remarkable difference was observed between the occlusal groups with respect to arch perimeters and arch length discrepancies (p = 0.000 and 0.000 respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Results of the current study indicate that crowding of teeth occurs as a consequence of decreased arch perimeters which may lead to increased arch length discrepancies. However, no prominent difference was noticed in the sum of tooth widths and arch widths among different occlusal groups. Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angle Class-I malocclusion; Angle Class-II malocclusion; Dental crowding; Normal occlusion

Year:  2021        PMID: 33679911      PMCID: PMC7931328          DOI: 10.12669/pjms.37.2.3240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pak J Med Sci        ISSN: 1681-715X            Impact factor:   1.088


  21 in total

1.  Variability of arch forms in various vertical facial patterns.

Authors:  Nabila Anwar; Mubassar Fida
Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 0.711

2.  Changes in the mandibular dental arch during the late mixed dentition stage: Experimental study.

Authors:  Aljazi Hussain Aljabaa; Nasser Dhafer Alqahtani; Abdullah Mohammad Aldrees; Eman Abdulrahman Alkofide; Fares Sultan Al-Sehaibany; Sahar Faisal Albarakati
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 0.781

3.  The form of the human dental arch.

Authors:  S Braun; W P Hnat; D E Fender; H L Legan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Morphometric Analysis of Odontometric Parameters for Gender Determination.

Authors:  Dilpreet Singh Grewal; Rajbir Kaur Khangura; Keya Sircar; Krishan Kumar Tyagi; Gurkirat Kaur; Simon David
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-08-01

5.  Evaluation of tooth size discrepancy in different malocclusion groups.

Authors:  Iffat Batool; Assad Abbas; S Ausaf Ali Rizvi; Irum Abbas
Journal:  J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec

6.  Comparisons of the dental arch changes in patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusions: extraction vs nonextraction treatments.

Authors:  S E Bishara; P Bayati; A R Zaher; J R Jakobsen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Arch widths in adults with Class I crowded and Class III malocclusions compared with normal occlusions.

Authors:  Timothy R Kuntz; Robert N Staley; Harold F Bigelow; Charles R Kremenak; Frank J Kohout; Jane R Jakobsen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Maxillary and mandibular anterior crown width/height ratio and its relation to various arch perimeters, arch length, and arch width groups.

Authors:  Fazal Shahid; Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Mohd Fadhli Khamis
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

9.  Study on the correlation parameters of Class II malocclusion in child tooth dentition early stage by using 3D technique.

Authors:  Peiying Xiong; Wen Sui; Wendan He; Qiaoling Lei; Wenli Gao
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

10.  An Evaluation of Dental Crowding in Relation to the Mesiodistal Crown Widths and Arch Dimensions in Southern Indian Population.

Authors:  Partha Jyoti Das; Winniecia Dkhar; Abhimanyu Pradhan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.