Literature DB >> 7800864

Public perceptions of the potential hazards associated with food production and food consumption: an empirical study.

P Sparks1, R Shepherd.   

Abstract

Although public perceptions of food-related hazards receive much media comment and debate, the research literature on such perceptions is sparse and piecemeal. In the reported study, 216 people completed a questionnaire relating to their perceptions of the "risk characteristics" of potential hazards associated with various aspects of food production and food consumption. Responses were examined via principal-components analysis to obtain a structural representation of risk perception of the kind provided by Fischhoff, Slovic, and their colleagues in their seminal psychometric work. A three-component solution accounting for 87% of the variance was obtained, with the dimensions labeled as "severity," "unknown," and "number of people exposed." The findings also yielded information pointing to evidence of the phenomenon of unrealistic optimism. We conclude that our findings offer a useful base upon which further in-depth research integrating different perspectives on risk perception with respect to food-related hazards may be developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7800864     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00291.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  18 in total

1.  The risks of eating and drinking.

Authors:  Susan B T Wilkinson; Gene Rowe; Nigel Lambert
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies.

Authors:  Terre Satterfield; Milind Kandlikar; Christian E H Beaudrie; Joseph Conti; Barbara Herr Harthorn
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  Factors influencing stakeholders attitudes toward genetically modified aedes mosquito.

Authors:  Latifah Amin; Hasrizul Hashim
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Technical assistance in the field of risk communication.

Authors:  Laura Maxim; Mario Mazzocchi; Stephan Van den Broucke; Fabiana Zollo; Tobin Robinson; Claire Rogers; Domagoj Vrbos; Giorgia Zamariola; Anthony Smith
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-04-29

5.  Fishing, fish consumption, and awareness about warnings in a university community in central New Jersey in 2007, and comparisons with 2004.

Authors:  Joanna Burger
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 6.498

6.  Genetically modified food and consumer risk responsibility: The effect of regulatory design and risk type on cognitive information processing.

Authors:  Ashkan Pakseresht; Anna Kristina Edenbrandt; Carl Johan Lagerkvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Assessing parents' perception of children's risk for recreational water illnesses.

Authors:  Jacquelyn McClain; Jay M Bernhardt; Michael J Beach
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Determinants of public attitudes to genetically modified salmon.

Authors:  Latifah Amin; Md Abul Kalam Azad; Mohd Hanafy Gausmian; Faizah Zulkifli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mercury in commercial fish: optimizing individual choices to reduce risk.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Alan H Stern; Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  A study of the perception of health risks among college students in China.

Authors:  Chenggang Zhang; Jingbo Fan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.