Literature DB >> 7800342

Lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: significance of positive number.

W J Lee1, P H Lee, S C Yue, K C Chang, T C Wei, K M Chen.   

Abstract

To investigate the significance of the number of node metastases in gastric cancer and its relationship to traditional anatomical classification, 305 patients who underwent a radical gastrectomy and extended lymphadenectomy (R3/4) with curative intent were reviewed. Lymph node metastases was found in 191 (62.6%) patients. The incidence of lymph node metastases was closely related to the depth of cancer invasion as well as the extent of lymph node group involvement. The frequency of metastases in different lymph node locations was related to the location of the primary tumor. The 3-year survival rates for patients with node involvement and without were 42.1 and 92.3%, respectively. In node number analysis, the distribution of the N1 group and the N4 group involvement was rather characteristic and could be predicted from a node number < 4 or > 12. The predictability of N2 and N3 involvement from node numbers 4-8 and 9-12 was less satisfactory. On the whole, patients with a metastatic node number < 4 could be considered to be N1 and had a relative good prognosis. Patients with node number 4-10 could be considered as N2 and > 10 as an incurable disease with distant metastases. Both had a poor prognosis. The data suggest that lymph node number represents the biologic behavior of cancer instead of the anatomic consideration of conventional N stage. The number of metastatic lymph node number is a good prognostic indicator with similar predicting power as the conventional node stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7800342     DOI: 10.1159/000227426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  5 in total

1.  Number of lymph node metastases determined by presurgical ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound is related to prognosis in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  S Natsugoe; H Yoshinaka; M Shimada; F Sakamoto; T Morinaga; S Nakano; C Kusano; M Baba; S Takao; T Aikou
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: is location more important than Number? An analysis of 1,038 patients.

Authors:  M S Karpeh; L Leon; D Klimstra; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Survival after resection of gastric cancer and prognostic relevance of systematic lymph node dissection: twenty years experience in Taiwan.

Authors:  W J Lee; W C Lee; S J Houng; C T Shun; R L Houng; P H Lee; K J Chang; T C Wei; K M Chen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Questionnaire survey regarding the current status of super-extended lymph node dissection in Japan.

Authors:  Shinji Morita; Takeo Fukagawa; Hisataka Fujiwara; Hitoshi Katai
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-09-15

5.  Clinicopathological risk factors for gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study in China.

Authors:  Kongwang Hu; Shuaili Wang; Zikun Wang; Longlong Li; Zhiguo Huang; Weiqiang Yu; Zhongxue Chen; Qing-Fa Wu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.