Literature DB >> 11685023

Number of lymph node metastases determined by presurgical ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound is related to prognosis in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

S Natsugoe1, H Yoshinaka, M Shimada, F Sakamoto, T Morinaga, S Nakano, C Kusano, M Baba, S Takao, T Aikou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact on prognosis of the number of lymph node metastases detected by ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound in patients with esophageal carcinoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound are useful for diagnosing tumor depth and lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal carcinoma. However, the clinical significance of the number of lymph node metastases before surgery has not been elucidated.
METHODS: The authors evaluated lymph node metastases using preoperative ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound in 329 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy. TNM classification and one-to-one comparison of lymph node metastasis was performed between the preoperative and histologic diagnosis. The number of lymph node metastases was subdivided into four groups: zero, one to three, four to seven, and eight or more.
RESULTS: The accuracy of preoperative ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis exceeded 70% in each category of TNM classification. The incidence of lymph node metastasis determined by preoperative and histologic diagnosis was 69.0% (234/339) and 59.3% (201/339), respectively. The correlation between preoperative and histologic diagnosis was significant (P <.0001). According to the subdivision of number of lymph node metastases, the accuracy rates associated with nodal involvement of zero, one to three, four to seven, and eight or more were 83.8%, 59.7%, 43.3%, and 96.0%, respectively. The clinical outcome between ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis and histologic diagnosis in stage grouping was almost similar. The 5-year survival rates of patients with zero, one to three, four to seven, and eight or more lymph node metastases determined by ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound were 53.3%, 33.8% 17.0%, and 0%, respectively. The differences among groups were statistically significant. The survival curves associated with preoperative and histologic diagnosis were similar.
CONCLUSIONS: Not only the stage grouping of TNM classification but also the number of lymph node metastases determined by ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound before surgery may be useful for predicting prognosis in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11685023      PMCID: PMC1422084          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200111000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  16 in total

1.  Echographic diagnosis of lesions of the abdominal, aorta and lymph nodes.

Authors:  A K Freimanis
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Assessment of cervical lymph node metastasis in esophageal carcinoma using ultrasonography.

Authors:  S Natsugoe; H Yoshinaka; M Shimada; K Shirao; S Nakano; C Kusano; M Baba; T Fukumoto; S Takao; T Aikou
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervical lymph nodes in preoperative staging of esophageal neoplasms.

Authors:  S B Doldi; E Lattuada; M A Zappa; U Cioffi; G Pieri; M Massari; M De Simone; A Peracchia
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1998 May-Jun

4.  Relation between endoscopic ultrasound findings and outcome of patients with tumors of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  M Hiele; P De Leyn; P Schurmans; A Lerut; S Huys; K Geboes; A M Gevers; P Rutgeerts
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Outcomes of extended radical esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer.

Authors:  T Nishimaki; T Suzuki; S Suzuki; S Kuwabara; K Hatakeyama
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  The number of lymph node metastases influences survival in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  K Kawahara; T Maekawa; K Okabayashi; T Shiraishi; Y Yoshinaga; S Yoneda; T Hideshima; T Shirakusa
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: significance of positive number.

Authors:  W J Lee; P H Lee; S C Yue; K C Chang; T C Wei; K M Chen
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.935

8.  The number of metastatic lymph nodes: a promising prognostic determinant for gastric carcinoma in the latest edition of the TNM classification.

Authors:  Y Kodera; Y Yamamura; Y Shimizu; A Torii; T Hirai; K Yasui; T Morimoto; T Kato; T Kito
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Oesophageal cancer staging using endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  J Vickers; D Alderson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Endosonographic features predictive of lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  M F Catalano; M V Sivak; T Rice; L A Gragg; J Van Dam
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic ultrasonography: imaging and beyond.

Authors:  T Rösch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Preoperative lymph node status on computed tomography influences the survival of pT1b, T2 and T3 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Kotaro Sugawara; Hiroharu Yamashita; Yukari Uemura; Koichi Yagi; Masato Nishida; Susumu Aikou; Sachiyo Nomura; Yasuyuki Seto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Combined pretherapeutic endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasonography may predict survival of patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer.

Authors:  Michael Bau Mortensen; Claus Fristrup; Alan Ainsworth; Henning Overgaard Nielsen; Torsten Pless; Claus Hovendal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  8th edition AJCC/UICC staging of cancers of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: application to clinical practice.

Authors:  Thomas W Rice; Deepa T Patil; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-03

5.  Endoscopic ultrasound for preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  X Zhang; D I Watson; C Lally; J R Bessell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Prognostic factors in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Hiroshi Okumura; Yasuto Uchikado; Masataka Matsumoto; Tetsuhiro Owaki; Yoshiaki Kita; Itaru Omoto; Ken Sasaki; Toshihide Sakurai; Tetsuro Setoyama; Bunpei Nabeki; Daisuke Matsushita; Sumiya Ishigami; Yoshiyuki Hiraki; Masayuki Nakajo; Shoji Natsugoe
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Clinical significance of mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Okumura; Yasuto Uchikado; Masataka Matsumoto; Itaru Omoto; Ken Sasaki; Yoshiaki Kita; Takaaki Arigami; Yoshikazu Uenosono; Akihiro Nakajo; Tetsuhiro Owaki; Shinichiro Mori; Sumiya Ishigami; Shoji Natsugoe
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Aggressive surgical resection does not improve survival in operable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with N2-3 status.

Authors:  Yu-Zhen Zheng; Wei Zhao; Yi Hu; Xiao-Xiao Ding-Lin; Jing Wen; Hong Yang; Qian-Wen Liu; Kong-Jia Luo; Qing-Yuan Huang; Jun-Ying Chen; Jian-Hua Fu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Significant host- and tumor-related factors for predicting prognosis in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Masanori Ikeda; Shoji Natsugoe; Shinichi Ueno; Masamichi Baba; Takashi Aikou
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for assessment of lymph node metastases in pancreatobiliary carcinoma.

Authors:  Takeshi Miyata; Masayuki Kitano; Shunsuke Omoto; Kumpei Kadosaka; Ken Kamata; Hajime Imai; Hiroki Sakamoto; Naoshi Nisida; Yogesh Harwani; Takamichi Murakami; Yoshifumi Takeyama; Yasutaka Chiba; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.