Literature DB >> 11325772

Evidence based case report: Advice about mammography for a young woman with a family history of breast cancer.

A Lucassen1, E Watson, D Eccles.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11325772      PMCID： PMC1120187          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.322.7293.1040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  21 in total

1.  Guidelines for a genetic risk based approach to advising women with a family history of breast cancer. UK Cancer Family Study Group (UKCFSG).

Authors:  D M Eccles; D G Evans; J Mackay
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Radiation risk of mammography related to benefit in screening programmes: a favourable balance?

Authors:  P M Beemsterboer; P G Warmerdam; R Boer; H J de Koning
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.136

3.  Screening women aged less than 50 years with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  J Kollias; D M Sibbering; R W Blamey; P A Holland; Z Obuszko; A R Wilson; A J Evans; I O Ellis; C W Elston
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Screening by mammography, women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  F Lalloo; C R Boggis; D G Evans; A Shenton; A G Threlfall; A Howell
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 5.  Radiation risk from screening mammography of women aged 40-49 years.

Authors:  S A Feig; R E Hendrick
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1997

6.  Management of women at increased risk for breast cancer: preliminary results from a new program.

Authors:  P L Chart; E Franssen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Earlier detection of breast cancer by surveillance of women at familial risk.

Authors:  M M Tilanus-Linthorst; C C Bartels; A I Obdeijn; M Oudkerk
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Do women who undergo further investigation for breast screening suffer adverse psychological consequences? A multi-centre follow-up study comparing different breast screening result groups five months after their last breast screening appointment.

Authors:  J Brett; J Austoker; G Ong
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1998-12

9.  Radiation risk and mammographic screening of women from 40 to 49 years of age: effect on breast cancer rates and years of life.

Authors:  A Mattsson; W Leitz; L E Rutqvist
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Efficacy of early diagnosis and treatment in women with a family history of breast cancer. European Familial Breast Cancer Collaborative Group.

Authors:  P Møller; M M Reis; G Evans; H Vasen; N Haites; E Anderson; C M Steel; J Apold; F Lalloo; L Maehle; P Preece; H Gregory; K Heimdal
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.434
View more
  4 in total

1.  Practice tips. Putting the "Palm" into practice.

Authors:  Michelle Greiver
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Clinical and pathological characteristics of Chinese patients with BRCA related breast cancer.

Authors:  Ava Kwong; L P Wong; H N Wong; F B F Law; E K O Ng; Y H Tang; W K Chan; D T K Suen; C Choi; L S Ho; K H Kwan; M Poon; T T Wong; K Chan; S W W Chan; M W L Ying; W C Chan; E S K Ma; J M Ford; D W West
Journal:  Hugo J       Date:  2010-04-10

Review 3.  Mammary ductoscopy in the current management of breast disease.

Authors:  Sarah S K Tang; Dominique J Twelves; Clare M Isacke; Gerald P H Gui
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Hybrid Detection of Breast Abnormalities Based on Contrast Agents: Introducing a Proof of Concept from a Physics Perspective.

Authors:  Panagiotis Liaparinos
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.847
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.