Literature DB >> 7795532

An automatic method involving cluster analysis of secondary structures for the identification of domains in proteins.

R Sowdhamini1, T L Blundell.   

Abstract

With a growing number of structures available in the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank, automatic methods for domain identification are required for the construction of databases. Domains are considered to be clusters of secondary structure elements. Thus, helices and strands are first clustered using intersecondary structural distances between C alpha positions, and dendrograms based on this distance measure are used to identify domains. Individual domains are recognized by a disjoint factor, which enables the automatic identification and classification into disjoint, interacting, and conjoint domains. Application to a database of 83 protein families and 18 unique structures shows that the approach provides an effective delineation of boundaries and identifies those proteins that can be considered as a single domain. A quantitative estimate of the interaction between domains has been proposed. The database of protein domains is a useful tool for understanding protein folding, for recognizing protein folds, and for understanding structure-activity relationships.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7795532      PMCID: PMC2143076          DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560040317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  32 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures.

Authors:  F C Bernstein; T F Koetzle; G J Williams; E F Meyer; M D Brice; J R Rodgers; O Kennard; T Shimanouchi; M Tasumi
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1977-05-25       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  On the conformation of proteins: towards the prediction of strand arrangements in beta-pleated sheets.

Authors:  M J Sternberg; J M Thornton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1977-06-25       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Structural patterns in globular proteins.

Authors:  M Levitt; C Chothia
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-06-17       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Nucleation, rapid folding, and globular intrachain regions in proteins.

Authors:  D B Wetlaufer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Comparison of super-secondary structures in proteins.

Authors:  S T Rao; M G Rossmann
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1973-05-15       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  Construction of phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  W M Fitch; E Margoliash
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Hierarchic organization of domains in globular proteins.

Authors:  G D Rose
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1979-11-05       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Parser for protein folding units.

Authors:  L Holm; C Sander
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1994-07

9.  Correlation of DNA exonic regions with protein structural units in haemoglobin.

Authors:  M Go
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-05-07       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The tree structural organization of proteins.

Authors:  G M Crippen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1978-12-15       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Classification of protein folds.

Authors:  Robert B Russell
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Generation of a consensus protein domain dictionary.

Authors:  R Dustin Schaeffer; Amanda L Jonsson; Andrew M Simms; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Protein domain assignment from the recurrence of locally similar structures.

Authors:  Chin-Hsien Tai; Vichetra Sam; Jean-Francois Gibrat; Jean Garnier; Peter J Munson; Byungkook Lee
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-12-22

4.  DDOMAIN: Dividing structures into domains using a normalized domain-domain interaction profile.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Bin Xue; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  "Pinning strategy": a novel approach for predicting the backbone structure in terms of protein blocks from sequence.

Authors:  A G De Brevern; C Etchebest; C Benros; S Hazout
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  PASS2: a semi-automated database of protein alignments organised as structural superfamilies.

Authors:  V Mallika; Anirban Bhaduri; R Sowdhamini
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Domain assignment for protein structures using a consensus approach: characterization and analysis.

Authors:  S Jones; M Stewart; A Michie; M B Swindells; C Orengo; J M Thornton
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Hydrophobic folding units at protein-protein interfaces: implications to protein folding and to protein-protein association.

Authors:  C J Tsai; R Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Identification of compact, hydrophobically stabilized domains and modules containing multiple peptide chains.

Authors:  M H Zehfus
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Hydrophobic folding units derived from dissimilar monomer structures and their interactions.

Authors:  C J Tsai; R Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.