MOTIVATION: The discovery of new protein folds is a relatively rare occurrence even as the rate of protein structure determination increases. This rarity reinforces the concept of folds as reusable units of structure and function shared by diverse proteins. If the folding mechanism of proteins is largely determined by their topology, then the folding pathways of members of existing folds could encompass the full set used by globular protein domains. RESULTS: We have used recent versions of three common protein domain dictionaries (SCOP, CATH and Dali) to generate a consensus domain dictionary (CDD). Surprisingly, 40% of the metafolds in the CDD are not composed of autonomous structural domains, i.e. they are not plausible independent folding units. This finding has serious ramifications for bioinformatics studies mining these domain dictionaries for globular protein properties. However, our main purpose in deriving this CDD was to generate an updated CDD to choose targets for MD simulation as part of our dynameomics effort, which aims to simulate the native and unfolding pathways of representatives of all globular protein consensus folds (metafolds). Consequently, we also compiled a list of representative protein targets of each metafold in the CDD. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: This domain dictionary is available at www.dynameomics.org.
MOTIVATION: The discovery of new protein folds is a relatively rare occurrence even as the rate of protein structure determination increases. This rarity reinforces the concept of folds as reusable units of structure and function shared by diverse proteins. If the folding mechanism of proteins is largely determined by their topology, then the folding pathways of members of existing folds could encompass the full set used by globular protein domains. RESULTS: We have used recent versions of three common protein domain dictionaries (SCOP, CATH and Dali) to generate a consensus domain dictionary (CDD). Surprisingly, 40% of the metafolds in the CDD are not composed of autonomous structural domains, i.e. they are not plausible independent folding units. This finding has serious ramifications for bioinformatics studies mining these domain dictionaries for globular protein properties. However, our main purpose in deriving this CDD was to generate an updated CDD to choose targets for MD simulation as part of our dynameomics effort, which aims to simulate the native and unfolding pathways of representatives of all globular protein consensus folds (metafolds). Consequently, we also compiled a list of representative protein targets of each metafold in the CDD. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: This domain dictionary is available at www.dynameomics.org.
Authors: J C KENDREW; R E DICKERSON; B E STRANDBERG; R G HART; D R DAVIES; D C PHILLIPS; V C SHORE Journal: Nature Date: 1960-02-13 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Marc W van der Kamp; R Dustin Schaeffer; Amanda L Jonsson; Alexander D Scouras; Andrew M Simms; Rudesh D Toofanny; Noah C Benson; Peter C Anderson; Eric D Merkley; Steven Rysavy; Dennis Bromley; David A C Beck; Valerie Daggett Journal: Structure Date: 2010-03-14 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Alison L Cuff; Ian Sillitoe; Tony Lewis; Oliver C Redfern; Richard Garratt; Janet Thornton; Christine A Orengo Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2008-11-07 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Eric D Merkley; Steven Rysavy; Abdullah Kahraman; Ryan P Hafen; Valerie Daggett; Joshua N Adkins Journal: Protein Sci Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 6.725