Literature DB >> 7937738

Parser for protein folding units.

L Holm1, C Sander.   

Abstract

General patterns of protein structural organization have emerged from studies of hundreds of structures elucidated by X-ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance. Structural units are commonly identified by visual inspection of molecular models using qualitative criteria. Here, we propose an algorithm for identification of structural units by objective, quantitative criteria based on atomic interactions. The underlying physical concept is maximal interactions within each unit and minimal interaction between units (domains). In a simple harmonic approximation, interdomain dynamics is determined by the strength of the interface and the distribution of masses. The most likely domain decomposition involves units with the most correlated motion, or largest interdomain fluctuation time. The decomposition of a convoluted 3-D structure is complicated by the possibility that the chain can cross over several times between units. Grouping the residues by solving an eigenvalue problem for the contact matrix reduces the problem to a one-dimensional search for all reasonable trial bisections. Recursive bisection yields a tree of putative folding units. Simple physical criteria are used to identify units that could exist by themselves. The units so defined closely correspond to crystallographers' notion of structural domains. The results are useful for the analysis of folding principles, for modular protein design and for protein engineering.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7937738     DOI: 10.1002/prot.340190309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  60 in total

1.  Measures of residue density in protein structures.

Authors:  F Baud; S Karlin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A comparison of position-specific score matrices based on sequence and structure alignments.

Authors:  Anna R Panchenko; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  MMDB: Entrez's 3D-structure database.

Authors:  Yanli Wang; John B Anderson; Jie Chen; Lewis Y Geer; Siqian He; David I Hurwitz; Cynthia A Liebert; Thomas Madej; Gabriele H Marchler; Aron Marchler-Bauer; Anna R Panchenko; Benjamin A Shoemaker; James S Song; Paul A Thiessen; Roxanne A Yamashita; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Classification of protein folds.

Authors:  Robert B Russell
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.695

5.  Use of residue pairs in protein sequence-sequence and sequence-structure alignments.

Authors:  J Jung; B Lee
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  The CATH database: an extended protein family resource for structural and functional genomics.

Authors:  F M G Pearl; C F Bennett; J E Bray; A P Harrison; N Martin; A Shepherd; I Sillitoe; J Thornton; C A Orengo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Finding weak similarities between proteins by sequence profile comparison.

Authors:  Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Rapid protein domain assignment from amino acid sequence using predicted secondary structure.

Authors:  Russell L Marsden; Liam J McGuffin; David T Jones
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Improving the performance of DomainParser for structural domain partition using neural network.

Authors:  Jun-tao Guo; Dong Xu; Dongsup Kim; Ying Xu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  A consensus view of fold space: combining SCOP, CATH, and the Dali Domain Dictionary.

Authors:  Ryan Day; David A C Beck; Roger S Armen; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.