Literature DB >> 7790249

The influence of quantitative tumor volume measurements on local control in advanced head and neck cancer using concomitant boost accelerated superfractionated irradiation.

C R Johnson1, S R Khandelwal, R K Schmidt-Ullrich, J Ravalese, D E Wazer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Current methods to clinically define head and neck tumor bulk are qualitative and imprecise. Although the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system is important for this purpose, limitations exist. This study will investigate the prognostic value of computed tomography (CT) derived tumor volume measurements in comparison to AJCC stage and other significant variables.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were treated with concomitant boost accelerated superfractionated irradiation. Doses ranged from 68.4-73.8 Gy (median 70.2 Gy). Good quality pretherapy CT scans were available in 51 patients. Total tumor volume (TTV) estimates were derived from these scans using digital integration of primary tumor and metastatic lymphadenopathy. Actuarial and multivariate statistical techniques were applied to analyze local control.
RESULTS: Thirty-six-month local control was 63%. TTV ranged from 5-196 cm3 (median 35 cm3) for all cases, 5-142 cm3 (median 17 cm3) for those controlled, and 16-196 cm3 (median 47 cm3) for local failures. There was a significant increase in failures above 35 cm3. Univariate analysis found that TTV, T-stage, N-stage, and primary site were each significant prognostic variables. Local control for TTV < or = 35 cm3 was 92% at 36 months vs. 34% for TTV > 35 cm3 (p = 0.0001). Multivariate analysis, however, found that TTV, primary site, and sex were important as independent variables; T and N stage were not independently significant unless TTV was removed from the model.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the prognostic significance of TTV in advanced carcinoma of the head and neck. This variable appears to be a more predictive than AJCC clinical stage. Quantitative tumor volume measurements may prove to be a useful parameter in future analyses of head and neck cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7790249     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00031-S

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  24 in total

1.  Impact of tumor control and presence of visible necrosis in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  Thomas Kuhnt; Arndt-Christian Mueller; Tanja Pelz; Gabriele Haensgen; Marc Bloching; Sabrina Koesling; Johannes Schubert; Juergen Dunst
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Tumour volumes: Predictors of early treatment response in locally advanced head and neck cancers treated with definitive chemoradiation.

Authors:  Parveen Ahlawat; Sheh Rawat; Anjali Kakria; Manoj Pal; Deepika Chauhan; Sarthak Tandon; Shraddha Jain
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-05-05

3.  Albumin and magnetic resonance imaging-liver volume to identify hepatitis B-related cirrhosis and esophageal varices.

Authors:  Hang Li; Tian-Wu Chen; Zhen-Lin Li; Xiao-Ming Zhang; Cheng-Jun Li; Xiao-Li Chen; Guang-Wen Chen; Jia-Ni Hu; Yong-Quan Ye
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Volumetric MR imaging of oral, maxillary sinus, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancers: correlation between tumor volume and lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Yasuo Kimura; Misa Sumi; Yoko Ichikawa; Yosuke Kawai; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Association between serum tumor markers and metabolic tumor volume or total lesion glycolysis in patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Pengyue Shi; Xue Meng; Mengmeng Ni; Xindong Sun; Ligang Xing; Jinming Yu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Clinical efficacy of primary tumor volume measurements: comparison of different primary sites.

Authors:  Eun-Jae Chung; Nam-Joon Lee; Seung-Kuk Baek; Soon-Young Kwon; Jeong-Soo Woo; Kwang-Yoon Jung
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 3.372

7.  Prognostic value of tumor volume in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeong-Hyun Kim; Joon-Kyoo Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Importance of tumor volume in supraglottic and glottic laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  L W van Bockel; E M Monninkhof; F A Pameijer; C H J Terhaard
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Pre- and post-radiotherapy MRI results as a predictive model for response in laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Redina Ljumanovic; Johannes A Langendijk; Otto S Hoekstra; Dirk L Knol; C René Leemans; Jonas A Castelijns
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Tumour volume measurement in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Vincent F H Chong
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.