Literature DB >> 16088405

Impact of tumor control and presence of visible necrosis in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy.

Thomas Kuhnt1, Arndt-Christian Mueller, Tanja Pelz, Gabriele Haensgen, Marc Bloching, Sabrina Koesling, Johannes Schubert, Juergen Dunst.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tumor volume after the lymph node involvement is one of the most important single prognostic factor in patients of head and neck cancers treated with radiotherapy. We have recently demonstrated that the hypoxic subvolume is more important than the total tumor volume. We therefore propose the hypothesis that the presence of visible necrosis might be an important factor for cure by radiotherapy in squamous cell cancers of the head and neck.
METHODS: A total of 51 patients with locally advanced inoperable (T3-4 or N2-3) squamous cell cancers of the head and neck (mean age 57 years, range 41-75 years) were prospectively investigated with regard to a possible impact of tumor volume. All patients received CT examination of the head and neck according to a standardized protocol (spiral CT, contrast enhancement after automatic injection), and the total tumor volume was calculated as the sum of volumes of all visible macroscopic tumor sites. Poorly perfused and necrotic areas (no contrast enhancement) within macroscopic tumor sites were also calculated. Patients were then treated with accelerated-hyperfractionated radiotherapy in about 6 weeks. Seventeen patients were treated with only radiation. Patients without contraindications to cisplatin chemotherapy received cisplatin chemotherapy or a combination of cisplatin and paclitaxel (N=34). The allocation of patients to certain treatment regimens was based on individual decisions in each case and not randomized.
RESULTS: In patients treated with radiation alone, 12/17 (71%) got recurrence whereas in patients treated with radiation plus cisplatin, only 14/34 (41%) recurred (P=0.05). The 2-year overall survival was for radiation alone versus radiation plus cisplatin 0% vs. 62% (P<0.0008). Tumors with smaller amount of necrosis (necrosis volume<4 cm3) had a good prognosis irrespective of type of treatment (radiation alone or radiation plus cisplatin). However, patients with tumors with a larger amount of necrosis (necrosis volume> or =4 cm3) had a significantly better outcome if they were treated with radiation plus cisplatin as compared to patients treated with radiation alone. In a multi-variate analysis using a Cox-regression model the type of treatment (radiotherapy plus versus without cisplatin) was the only independent prognostic factor for event-free survival (P<0.03) in the whole group.
CONCLUSIONS: In this non-randomized retrospective investigation with limited sample size, radiation plus cisplatin was superior to radiation alone. This resulted mainly from a higher efficacy of the radiochemotherapy regimen in patients with large and especially necrotic tumors. The prognostic and predictive impact of visible necrosis should be further evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16088405     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-005-0018-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  29 in total

1.  [Tumor volume as a prognostic factor in the radiotherapy of carcinomas in the head-neck area].

Authors:  R Fietkau
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Variability of tumor volumes in T3-staged head and neck tumors.

Authors:  F A Pameijer; A J Balm; F J Hilgers; S H Muller
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  Detection of cervical metastasis. A meta-analysis comparing computed tomography with physical examination.

Authors:  R M Merritt; M F Williams; T H James; E S Porubsky
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-02

4.  Correlation between nodal density in contrasted scans and response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell cancer: a prospective validation.

Authors:  F Janot; E Cvitkovic; J D Piekarski; R Sigal; J P Armand; A Bensmaine; B Luboinski
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  Confirmation of a prognostic index for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  T Wigren
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Evaluation of prognostic factors in a tumor volume-adapted treatment strategy for localized Ewing sarcoma of bone: the CESS 86 experience. Cooperative Ewing Sarcoma Study.

Authors:  S Ahrens; C Hoffmann; S Jabar; G Braun-Munzinger; M Paulussen; J Dunst; C Rübe; W Winkelmann; A Heinecke; U Göbel; K Winkler; D Harms; J Treuner; H Jürgens
Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol       Date:  1999-03

7.  Tumor volume: a basic and specific response predictor in radiotherapy.

Authors:  H H Dubben; H D Thames; H P Beck-Bornholdt
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  The effect of primary tumor volumes in advanced T-staged nasopharyngeal tumors.

Authors:  Cheng-Chuan Chang; Mu-Kuan Chen; Mu-Tai Liu; Hwa-Koon Wu
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.147

9.  Vascular architecture, hypoxia, and proliferation in first-generation xenografts of human head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Anna S E Ljungkvist; Johan Bussink; Paulus F J W Rijken; Johannes H A M Kaanders; Albert J van der Kogel; Juliana Denekamp
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Parameters that predict local control after definitive radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  William M Mendenhall; Christopher G Morris; Robert J Amdur; Russell W Hinerman; Anthony A Mancuso
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.147

View more
  12 in total

1.  [TH-302: a new hypoxia-activated cytostatic agent in pancreatic cancer treatment].

Authors:  Claudia Schmalz; Jürgen Dunst
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Radiomics as prognostic factor in brain metastases treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery.

Authors:  Chih-Ying Huang; Cheng-Chia Lee; Huai-Che Yang; Chung-Jung Lin; Hsiu-Mei Wu; Wen-Yuh Chung; Cheng-Ying Shiau; Wan-Yuo Guo; David Hung-Chi Pan; Syu-Jyun Peng
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Survival of patients with head and neck cancer. Impact of physical status and comorbidities.

Authors:  F Sadat; A Wienke; J Dunst; T Kuhnt
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Patient and tumor factors at diagnosis in a multi-ethnic primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cohort.

Authors:  Seema Sethi; Mei Lu; Alissa Kapke; Michael S Benninger; Maria J Worsham
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  DNA hypermethylation markers of poor outcome in laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  Josena K Stephen; Kang Mei Chen; Veena Shah; Shaleta Havard; Alissa Kapke; Mei Lu; Michael S Benninger; Maria J Worsham
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 6.551

6.  The effect of tumor volume on radiotherapy outcome and correlation with other prognostic factors in patients with T2 supraglottic cancer.

Authors:  Tomasz W Rutkowski; Bogusław Maciejewski; Zofia Kołosza; Andrzej Wygoda; Krzysztof Składowski; Beata Hejduk; Roman Rutkowski
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2014-12-31

7.  The prognostic value of tumor necrosis in patients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastases.

Authors:  Kristina Martens; Thekla Meyners; Dirk Rades; Volker Tronnier; Matteo Mario Bonsanto; Dirk Petersen; Jürgen Dunst; Kathrin Dellas
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Approximation of head and neck cancer volumes in contrast enhanced CT.

Authors:  D Dejaco; C Url; V H Schartinger; A K Haug; N Fischer; D Riedl; A Posch; H Riechelmann; G Widmann
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 9.  The role of tumor volume in radiotherapy of patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Tomasz Rutkowski
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Simulation of head and neck cancer oxygenation and doubling time in a 4D cellular model with angiogenesis.

Authors:  Jake C Forster; Michael J J Douglass; Wendy M Harriss-Phillips; Eva Bezak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.