Literature DB >> 7785455

Quantitative ultrasound and vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group.

D C Bauer1, C C Glüer, H K Genant, K Stone.   

Abstract

Quantitative ultrasound is a promising technique to evaluate fracture risk. To test the hypothesis that reduction of one ultrasound measurement, broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), is associated with an increased risk of vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women, we performed a cross-sectional analysis of 442 women aged 55-80 years enrolling in a clinical trial of alendronate. Prior to randomization, we obtained bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of the hip, spine, and whole body, radiographs of lateral lumbar and thoracic spine, and duplicate measurements of calcaneal BUA with a Walker Sonix UBA575. Vertebral fractures were defined by morphometry and semiquantitative reading by a radiologist. After adjustment for potential confounders, the relative risk of vertebral fracture was 1.8 (95% CI 1.4-2.3) for each standard deviation reduction in BUA; for each standard deviation reduction in BMD, the relative risk was 1.7 (95% CI 1.3-2.1) at the femoral neck, and 2.2 (95% CI 1.7-2.9) at the spine. Adjustment for hip, spine, or whole body BMD did not significantly alter the relation between BUA and vertebral fracture. For example, after adjusting for spine BMD, the relative risk of vertebral fracture was 1.5 (95% CI 1.1-2.0) for each standard deviation reduction in BUA. We conclude that low BUA is associated with the presence of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women. The relation between BUA and vertebral fracture is similar to that observed for BMD and vertebral fractures. Furthermore, the relation between BUA and vertebral fracture persists after adjustment for BMD.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7785455     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650100304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  25 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic value of ultrasound analysis and bone densitometry as predictors of vertebral deformity in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S Gonnelli; C Cepollaro; D Agnusdei; R Palmieri; S Rossi; C Gennari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Bone imaging: traditional techniques and their interpretation.

Authors:  Holger F Boehm; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Influence of handedness on calcaneal ultrasound: implications for assessment of osteoporosis and study design.

Authors:  G M Howard; T V Nguyen; N A Pocock; P J Kelly; J A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Assessment of the relationship between broadband ultrasound attenuation and bone mineral density at the calcaneus using BUA imaging and DXA.

Authors:  C Chappard; P Laugier; B Fournier; C Roux; G Berger
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Quantitative ultrasound imaging at the calcaneus using an automatic region of interest.

Authors:  B Fournier; C Chappard; C Roux; G Berger; P Laugier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Quantitative ultrasound for the assessment of bone status.

Authors:  R Morita; I Yamamoto; I Yuu; Y Hamanaka; T Ohta; M Takada; R Matsushita; K Masuda
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  The epidemiology of quantitative ultrasound: a review of the relationships with bone mass, osteoporosis and fracture risk.

Authors:  E W Gregg; A M Kriska; L M Salamone; M M Roberts; S J Anderson; R E Ferrell; L H Kuller; J A Cauley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Calcaneus ultrasound in males: normative data in the Croatian population (ECUM study).

Authors:  D Kastelan; M Kujundzic-Tiljak; I Kraljevic; I Kardum; Z Giljevic; M Korsic
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 9.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review.

Authors:  C F Njeh; C M Boivin; C M Langton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The effect of age, weight, and lifestyle factors on calcaneal quantitative ultrasound: the ESOPO study.

Authors:  Silvano Adami; Sandro Giannini; Ruben Giorgino; GianCarlo Isaia; Stefania Maggi; Luigi Sinigaglia; Paolo Filipponi; Gaetano Crepaldi; Ombretta Di Munno
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.