Literature DB >> 7777506

The folding of GroEL-bound barnase as a model for chaperonin-mediated protein folding.

F J Corrales1, A R Fersht.   

Abstract

We have analyzed the pathway of folding of barnase bound to GroEL to resolve the controversy of whether proteins can fold while bound to chaperonins (GroEL or Cpn60) or fold only after their release into solution. Four phases in the folding were detected by rapid-reaction kinetic measurements of the intrinsic fluorescence of both wild type and barnase mutants. The phases were assigned from their rate laws, sensitivity to mutations, and correspondence to regain of catalytic activity. At high ratios of denatured barnase to GroEL, 4 mol of barnase rapidly bind per 14-mer of GroEL. At high ratios of GroEL to barnase, 1 mol of barnase binds with a rate constant of 3.5 x 10(7) s-1.M-1. This molecule then refolds with a low rate constant that changes on mutation in parallel with the rate constant for the folding in solution. This rate constant corresponds to the regain of the overall catalytic activity of barnase and increases 15-fold on the addition of ATP to a physiologically relevant value of approximately 0.4 s-1. The multiply bound molecules of barnase that are present at high ratios of GroEL to barnase fold with a rate constant that is also sensitive to mutation but is 10 times higher. If the 110-residue barnase can fold when bound to GroEL and many moles can bind simultaneously, then smaller parts of large proteins should be able to fold while bound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7777506      PMCID: PMC41687          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.92.12.5326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  22 in total

1.  Estimating the contribution of engineered surface electrostatic interactions to protein stability by using double-mutant cycles.

Authors:  L Serrano; A Horovitz; B Avron; M Bycroft; A R Fersht
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1990-10-09       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 2.  The folding of an enzyme. II. Substructure of barnase and the contribution of different interactions to protein stability.

Authors:  L Serrano; J T Kellis; P Cann; A Matouschek; A R Fersht
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-04-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Calculation of protein extinction coefficients from amino acid sequence data.

Authors:  S C Gill; P H von Hippel
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1989-11-01       Impact factor: 3.365

4.  Complex interactions between the chaperonin 60 molecular chaperone and dihydrofolate reductase.

Authors:  P V Viitanen; G K Donaldson; G H Lorimer; T H Lubben; A A Gatenby
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1991-10-08       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  The reaction cycle of GroEL and GroES in chaperonin-assisted protein folding.

Authors:  J Martin; M Mayhew; T Langer; F U Hartl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Molecular chaperone functions of heat-shock proteins.

Authors:  J P Hendrick; F U Hartl
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 23.643

7.  Refolding of barnase in the presence of GroE.

Authors:  T E Gray; A R Fersht
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-08-20       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Fluorescence spectrum of barnase: contributions of three tryptophan residues and a histidine-related pH dependence.

Authors:  R Loewenthal; J Sancho; A R Fersht
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1991-07-09       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Co-operative interactions during protein folding.

Authors:  A Horovitz; A R Fersht
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-04-05       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Refolding of barnase mutants and pro-barnase in the presence and absence of GroEL.

Authors:  T E Gray; J Eder; M Bycroft; A G Day; A R Fersht
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  20 in total

1.  GroEL binds a late folding intermediate of phage P22 coat protein.

Authors:  M D de Beus; S M Doyle; C M Teschke
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 2.  GroEL-mediated protein folding: making the impossible, possible.

Authors:  Zong Lin; Hays S Rye
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.250

3.  Revisiting the GroEL-GroES reaction cycle via the symmetric intermediate implied by novel aspects of the GroEL(D398A) mutant.

Authors:  Ayumi Koike-Takeshita; Masasuke Yoshida; Hideki Taguchi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Reconciling theories of chaperonin accelerated folding with experimental evidence.

Authors:  Andrew I Jewett; Joan-Emma Shea
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Toward a mechanism for GroEL.GroES chaperone activity: an ATPase-gated and -pulsed folding and annealing cage.

Authors:  F J Corrales; A R Fersht
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Minimal and optimal mechanisms for GroE-mediated protein folding.

Authors:  A P Ben-Zvi; J Chatellier; A R Fersht; P Goloubinoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The effect of macromolecular crowding on chaperonin-mediated protein folding.

Authors:  J Martin; F U Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Native-like structure of a protein-folding intermediate bound to the chaperonin GroEL.

Authors:  M S Goldberg; J Zhang; S Sondek; C R Matthews; R O Fox; A L Horwich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Influence of the GroE molecular chaperone machine on the in vitro refolding of Escherichia coli beta-galactosidase.

Authors:  A Ayling; F Baneyx
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Mechanism of chaperonin action: GroES binding and release can drive GroEL-mediated protein folding in the absence of ATP hydrolysis.

Authors:  M K Hayer-Hartl; F Weber; F U Hartl
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.