Literature DB >> 8103803

Refolding of barnase in the presence of GroE.

T E Gray1, A R Fersht.   

Abstract

The refolding of barnase in the presence of GroEL has been monitored on the millisecond to seconds time scale using stopped-flow kinetics. GroEL binds rapidly and tightly to the denatured enzyme with a second-order rate constant of greater than 1.3 x 10(8) s-1 M-1 and slows down greatly the rate of barnase refolding. However, addition of ever increasing concentrations of GroEL does not prevent barnase refolding completely, as would be expected from mass action if folding of barnase could proceed only in free solution. At saturating concentrations of GroEL, barnase refolds with a half-life of 30 s, compared with 50 ms for refolding of free enzyme. The rate-determining step in the refolding of free barnase is the reaction of a "late" folding intermediate. A mutant of barnase that fold more slowly (Ser-->Ala91), refolds at a correspondingly lower rate when bound to GroEL, suggesting that formation of the fully folded state may be rate limiting for folding on GroEL. For the slow-folding Ser-->Ala91 mutant, the rate-determining refolding step has a half-life of 180 ms. In sequential mixing experiments, a delay was introduced to allow the Ser-->Ala91 mutant to refold for 30 ms before being mixed with GroEL. This reduces by 50% the amount of mutant barnase initially bound by GroEL. As only 11% of this mutant barnase is fully refolded from the late intermediate in 30 ms, there is preferential binding of an earlier refolding state to GroEL. We show by single mixing experiments that binding, not hydrolysis, of ATP reduces the lag in regain of barnase activity seen with GroEL alone. In the presence of high concentrations of ATP and GroEL the rate constant for refolding of barnase approaches that found in their absence, probably because ATP reduces the affinity of GroEL for refolding barnase, such that bound barnase is released and refolds unhindered. The addition of exceedingly small quantities of GroES in the presence of excess GroEL and a moderate amount of ATP also has a marked effect on the barnase refolding rate constant, suggesting that GroES may have higher affinity for the barnase: GroEL complex than for GroEL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8103803     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  25 in total

1.  GroEL binds a late folding intermediate of phage P22 coat protein.

Authors:  M D de Beus; S M Doyle; C M Teschke
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 2.  GroEL-mediated protein folding: making the impossible, possible.

Authors:  Zong Lin; Hays S Rye
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.250

3.  GroEL/S substrate specificity based on substrate unfolding propensity.

Authors:  Kristin N Parent; Carolyn M Teschke
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.667

4.  Coupling between allosteric transitions in GroEL and assisted folding of a substrate protein.

Authors:  George Stan; George H Lorimer; D Thirumalai; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Reconciling theories of chaperonin accelerated folding with experimental evidence.

Authors:  Andrew I Jewett; Joan-Emma Shea
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Toward a mechanism for GroEL.GroES chaperone activity: an ATPase-gated and -pulsed folding and annealing cage.

Authors:  F J Corrales; A R Fersht
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Chaperonin-facilitated protein folding: optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism.

Authors:  M J Todd; G H Lorimer; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A thermodynamic coupling mechanism for GroEL-mediated unfolding.

Authors:  S Walter; G H Lorimer; F X Schmid
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Minimal and optimal mechanisms for GroE-mediated protein folding.

Authors:  A P Ben-Zvi; J Chatellier; A R Fersht; P Goloubinoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The effect of macromolecular crowding on chaperonin-mediated protein folding.

Authors:  J Martin; F U Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.