Literature DB >> 7762721

Has the use of cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening increased in the United States?

L M Anderson1, D S May.   

Abstract

This report describes trends in reported breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening within the US population from 1987 to 1992. Data from the 1987 and 1992 Cancer Control Supplements of the National Health Interview Survey were analyzed to determine use of Pap smears by women aged 18+; of mammography and clinical breast examination by women aged 50+; and of proctoscopy, digital rectal examination, and fecal occult blood testing among men and women aged 50+. Use of mammography doubled between 1987 and 1992 while Pap smear use changed very little. Use of the three colorectal cancer screening modalities increased but levels remained low. Usage trends were also assessed in relation to several sociodemographic factors. Disparities in screening reported in 1987 according to income and education persisted in 1992.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7762721      PMCID: PMC1615482          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.85.6.840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  6 in total

1.  Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975-1981.

Authors:  A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks; R Holland; M Mravunac; F Sturmans; N E Day
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Selection, follow-up, and analysis in the Health Insurance Plan Study: a randomized trial with breast cancer screening.

Authors:  S Shapiro; W Venet; P Strax; L Venet; R Roeser
Journal:  Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1985-05

3.  Changes in the use of screening mammography: evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Surveys.

Authors:  N Breen; L Kessler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study.

Authors:  J S Mandel; J H Bond; T R Church; D C Snover; G M Bradley; L M Schuman; F Ederer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Colorectal cancer: detection, treatment, and rehabilitation.

Authors:  J J DeCosse; G J Tsioulias; J S Jacobson
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

  6 in total
  62 in total

1.  Variation in recommendations for cancer screening among primary care physicians in New Mexico.

Authors:  C J Herman; R M Hoffman; K K Altobelli
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1999-08

2.  Predictors of mammography use among Canadian women aged 50-69: findings from the 1996/97 National Population Health Survey.

Authors:  C J Maxwell; C M Bancej; J Snider
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Low income, race, and the use of mammography.

Authors:  D M Makuc; N Breen; V Freid
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Geographic socioeconomic status, race, and advanced-stage breast cancer in New York City.

Authors:  Sharon Stein Merkin; Lori Stevenson; Neil Powe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Factors important in promoting cervical cancer screening among Canadian women: findings from the 1996-97 National Population Health Survey (NPHS).

Authors:  C J Maxwell; C M Bancej; J Snider; S A Vik
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

6.  Primary care: is there enough time for prevention?

Authors:  Kimberly S H Yarnall; Kathryn I Pollak; Truls Østbye; Katrina M Krause; J Lloyd Michener
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Predicting patterns of mammography use: a geographic perspective on national needs for intervention research.

Authors:  Julie Legler; Nancy Breen; Helen Meissner; Don Malec; Cathy Coyne
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Racial/ethnic differences in the self-reported use of screening mammography.

Authors:  Alma R Jones; Lee S Caplan; Mary Kidd Davis
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2003-10

9.  The role of social capital in African-American women's use of mammography.

Authors:  Lorraine Dean; S V Subramanian; David R Williams; Katrina Armstrong; Camille Zubrinsky Charles; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Interest in genetic counseling and testing for adolescent nicotine addiction susceptibility among a sample of adolescent medicine providers attending a scientific conference on adolescent health.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Beth N Peshkin; Anisha Abraham; Lauren Wine; Leslie R Walker
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.