Literature DB >> 7762146

Speed discrimination of motion-in-depth using binocular cues.

J M Harris1, S N Watamaniuk.   

Abstract

Although it is well known that motion-in-depth can be detected using binocular cues, it is not known whether those cues can be used to judge the speed of an object moving in depth. There are at least two possible binocular cues that could be used by the visual system to calculate three dimensional (3-D) speed: the rate of change of binocular disparity, or a comparison of the speeds of motion in the two eyes. We tested which of these cues is used to discriminate the speed of motion-in-depth. First, speed discrimination was measured for a dot moving away from the observer in depth (along the z-axis) and for a random dot stereogram in which a central square moved away from the observer in depth. These stimuli contained both disparity and monocular motion cues. Speed discrimination thresholds were as good for 3-D motion as for monocular sideways motion. Second, a dynamic random dot stereogram (in which the random dot pattern was replaced by a new dot pattern every frame) was used to remove consistent monocular cues. 3-D speed discrimination was now very poor, suggesting that the rate of change of disparity is not a good cue for 3-D speed. Finally, we tested whether observers were able to use the monocular motion cue from one eye to perform the speed discrimination task, or whether there had to be a comparison of the two eyes' monocular cues. By adding a small x-axis velocity component (with random direction) to the z-axis motion, it was possible to disrupt the monocular motion signals without altering the speed of the motion in 3-D. This manipulation did not disrupt the observers' performance, suggesting that monocular speed cues were not being used independently but that there was a comparison of monocular motion signals from the two eyes.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7762146     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00194-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  11 in total

1.  Seeing motion in depth using inter-ocular velocity differences.

Authors:  Julian Martin Fernandez; Bart Farell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Vergence effects on the perception of motion-in-depth.

Authors:  Harold T Nefs; Julie M Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neural representation of motion-in-depth in area MT.

Authors:  Takahisa M Sanada; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The direction of retinal motion facilitates binocular stereopsis.

Authors:  M F Bradshaw; B G Cumming
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Form features provide a cue to the angular velocity of rotating objects.

Authors:  Christopher David Blair; Jessica Goold; Kyle Killebrew; Gideon Paul Caplovitz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Two independent mechanisms for motion-in-depth perception: evidence from individual differences.

Authors:  Harold T Nefs; Louise O'Hare; Julie M Harris
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-10-12

7.  Speed change discrimination for motion in depth using constant world and retinal speeds.

Authors:  Abigail R I Lee; Justin M Ales; Julie M Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Investigating Human Visual Sensitivity to Binocular Motion-in-Depth for Anti- and De-Correlated Random-Dot Stimuli.

Authors:  Martin Giesel; Alex R Wade; Marina Bloj; Julie M Harris
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-01

9.  Decoding Neural Responses to Motion-in-Depth Using EEG.

Authors:  Marc M Himmelberg; Federico G Segala; Ryan T Maloney; Julie M Harris; Alex R Wade
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Human short-latency ocular vergence responses produced by interocular velocity differences.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; C Quaia; E J FitzGibbon; B G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.