Literature DB >> 16023695

Seeing motion in depth using inter-ocular velocity differences.

Julian Martin Fernandez1, Bart Farell.   

Abstract

An object moving in depth produces retinal images that change in position over time by different amounts in the two eyes. This allows stereoscopic perception of motion in depth to be based on either one or both of two different visual signals: inter-ocular velocity differences, and binocular disparity change over time. Disparity change over time can produce the perception of motion in depth. However, demonstrating the same for inter-ocular velocity differences has proved elusive because of the difficulty of isolating this cue from disparity change (the inverse can easily be done). No physiological data are available, and existing psychophysical data are inconclusive as to whether inter-ocular velocity differences are used in primate vision. Here, we use motion adaptation to assess the contribution of inter-ocular velocity differences to the perception of motion in depth. If inter-ocular velocity differences contribute to motion in depth, we would expect that discriminability of direction of motion in depth should be improved after adaptation to frontoparallel motion. This is because an inter-ocular velocity difference is a comparison between two monocular frontoparallel motion signals, and because frontoparallel speed discrimination improves after motion adaptation. We show that adapting to frontoparallel motion does improve both frontoparallel speed discrimination and motion-in-depth direction discrimination. No improvement would be expected if only disparity change over time contributes to motion in depth. Furthermore, we found that frontoparallel motion adaptation diminishes discrimination of both speed and direction of motion in depth in dynamic random dot stereograms, in which changing disparity is the only cue available. The results provide strong evidence that inter-ocular velocity differences contribute to the perception of motion in depth and thus that the human visual system contains mechanisms for detecting differences in velocity between the two eyes' retinal images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16023695      PMCID: PMC1616272          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.05.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  19 in total

1.  Binocular three-dimensional motion detection: contributions of lateral motion and stereomotion.

Authors:  J H Sumnall; J M Harris
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Perceived speed of motion in depth is reduced in the periphery.

Authors:  K Brooks; G Mather
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Stereopsis with persisting and dynamic textures.

Authors:  R S Allison; I P Howard
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Stereomotion speed perception is contrast dependent.

Authors:  K Brooks
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Minimum displacement thresholds for binocular three-dimensional motion.

Authors:  Jane H Sumnall; Julie M Harris
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Detecting binocular 3D motion in static 3D noise: no effect of viewing distance.

Authors:  J M Harris; J H Sumnall
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2000

7.  Motion in depth based on inter-ocular velocity differences.

Authors:  S Shioiri; H Saisho; H Yaguchi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Bootstrap estimates of the statistical accuracy of thresholds obtained from psychometric functions.

Authors:  D H Foster; W F Bischof
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  Interocular velocity difference contributes to stereomotion speed perception.

Authors:  Kevin R Brooks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Stereoscopic depth movement: two eyes less sensitive than one.

Authors:  C W Tyler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-11-26       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  11 in total

1.  Neural representation of motion-in-depth in area MT.

Authors:  Takahisa M Sanada; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Area MT encodes three-dimensional motion.

Authors:  Thaddeus B Czuba; Alexander C Huk; Lawrence K Cormack; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Multiplexing in the primate motion pathway.

Authors:  Alexander C Huk
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Three-dimensional motion aftereffects reveal distinct direction-selective mechanisms for binocular processing of motion through depth.

Authors:  Thaddeus B Czuba; Bas Rokers; Kyle Guillet; Alexander C Huk; Lawrence K Cormack
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Binocular Mechanisms of 3D Motion Processing.

Authors:  Lawrence K Cormack; Thaddeus B Czuba; Jonas Knöll; Alexander C Huk
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 6.422

6.  On the inverse problem of binocular 3D motion perception.

Authors:  Martin Lages; Suzanne Heron
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  The magnitude of monocular light attenuation required to elicit the Pulfrich illusion.

Authors:  C Vijay Reena Durai; Siddhart Rajendran; Michael A Webster; Sandeep Vempati; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 1.984

8.  Asymmetries between achromatic and chromatic extraction of 3D motion signals.

Authors:  Milena Kaestner; Ryan T Maloney; Kirstie H Wailes-Newson; Marina Bloj; Julie M Harris; Antony B Morland; Alex R Wade
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Investigating Human Visual Sensitivity to Binocular Motion-in-Depth for Anti- and De-Correlated Random-Dot Stimuli.

Authors:  Martin Giesel; Alex R Wade; Marina Bloj; Julie M Harris
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-01

10.  Speed discrimination in the far monocular periphery: A relative advantage for interocular comparisons consistent with self-motion.

Authors:  Devon A Greer; Kathryn Bonnen; Alexander C Huk; Lawrence K Cormack
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.