Literature DB >> 7760126

Factors shaping the tone level sensitivity of single neurons in posterior field of cat auditory cortex.

D P Phillips1, M N Semple, L M Kitzes.   

Abstract

1. The posterior field (field P) of the cat's auditory cortex contains a higher proportion of neurons whose response/level functions for characteristic frequency (CF) tones are nonmonotonic than does the primary field (AI). The general purpose of the present study is to assess whether the response/level functions of field P neurons are generated by the same mechanisms as those of cells in AI. All of the data came from single neurons in the cortices of barbiturate-anesthetized cats, to which we presented tonal stimuli through sealed, calibrated stimulating systems. 2. We obtained quantitative data from 123 neurons, of which 108 were located in field P. Of the 108 field P cells, 70% had nonmonotonic response/level functions for 5-ms rise time tones of CF. For cells of any given CF, both CF thresholds and best SPLs (i.e., SPLs associated with maximal responses) varied widely. A correlation analysis revealed that a linear relation between best SPL and CF threshold accounted for 73% of the data variance in the association between those response variables. An analysis of data from 83 nonmonotonic cells in AI revealed a similar relation. 3. Field P neurons whose response/level functions were non-monotonic for 5-ms rise time CF tones became even more narrowly tuned to SPL when the rise time of the tone bursts was reduced to 1 ms. Lengthening the rise time to 20 ms reduced or eliminated the SPL tuning in almost all of these neurons. The general form of monotonic tone response/level functions was commonly unaffected by variation in signal rise time. In a few instances, cells with monotonic response/level functions for 5- and 20-ms rise time tones developed nonmonotonic functions for 1-ms rise time tones. 4. Field P neurons with nonmonotonic response/level functions for CF tones usually failed to respond to wideband noise pulses, or, less commonly, responded to noise only at low SPLs. In contrast, field P cells with a monotonic response to CF tones usually responded monotonically to noise. 5. The minimal mean first-spike latencies of field P neurons were generally longer than those of AI cells studied under similar conditions. The precision of first-spike timing, measured using the SD of the mean first-spike latency, was commonly poorer than that of AI cells. 6. The properties of field P cells followed the same rules as those seen in AI.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7760126     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1995.73.2.674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  26 in total

1.  Comparing the functional representations of central and border whiskers in rat primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  B A Brett-Green; C H Chen-Bee; R D Frostig
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Reorganization in processing of spectral and temporal input in the rat posterior auditory field induced by environmental enrichment.

Authors:  Vikram Jakkamsetti; Kevin Q Chang; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Inferring the role of inhibition in auditory processing of complex natural stimuli.

Authors:  Nadja Schinkel-Bielefeld; Stephen V David; Shihab A Shamma; Daniel A Butts
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Level-tuned neurons in primary auditory cortex adapt differently to loud versus soft sounds.

Authors:  Paul V Watkins; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Transformation of temporal processing across auditory cortex of awake macaques.

Authors:  Brian H Scott; Brian J Malone; Malcolm N Semple
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Nonmonotonic synaptic excitation and imbalanced inhibition underlying cortical intensity tuning.

Authors:  Guangying K Wu; Pingyang Li; Huizhong W Tao; Li I Zhang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Spectral and temporal processing in rat posterior auditory cortex.

Authors:  Pritesh K Pandya; Daniel L Rathbun; Raluca Moucha; Navzer D Engineer; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Spatial sensitivity of neurons in the anterior, posterior, and primary fields of cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ian A Harrington; G Christopher Stecker; Ewan A Macpherson; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Temporal integration and duration tuning in the dorsal zone of cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  J He; T Hashikawa; H Ojima; Y Kinouchi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Temporal codes for amplitude contrast in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Brian J Malone; Brian H Scott; Malcolm N Semple
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.