Literature DB >> 7759645

Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80-110 Hz.

O G Lins1, P E Picton, T W Picton, S C Champagne, A Durieux-Smith.   

Abstract

Steady-state responses can be recorded from the human scalp in response to tones that are sinusoidally modulated in amplitude at rates between 60 and 120 Hz. For 60 dB SPL 1000-Hz tones the maximum baseline-to-peak amplitude of about 0.06 microV occurs for modulation rates between 80 and 95 Hz. The phase of the response does not change with modulation depths greater than 25% and the amplitude saturates at modulation depths greater than 50%. The presence or absence of a response can be accurately determined by frequency-domain statistics and the response becomes clearly recognizable at intensities that are 16 +/- 8 dB above behavioral thresholds. With increasing intensity the response increases in amplitude at 1.9 nV/dB until an intensity of 70 dB SPL. As the intensity increases above 70 dB SPL the response increases in amplitude more rapidly at 7.8 nV/dB (at 1000 Hz) and contains significant energy at harmonics of the modulation frequency. This second stage of the intensity function is more prominent for stimuli with lower carrier frequencies (500 more than 1000 more than 2000 Hz) and is attenuated by high-pass masking. These steady-state responses should be helpful in evaluating human auditory physiology and in objective audiometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7759645     DOI: 10.1121/1.411869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  [Acoustic evoked potentials. The nomenclature in terminological transition].

Authors:  I Baljić; M Walger
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Electrically evoked auditory steady state responses in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Michael Hofmann; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-22

3.  Losing the music: aging affects the perception and subcortical neural representation of musical harmony.

Authors:  Oliver Bones; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Dry EEG electrodes.

Authors:  M A Lopez-Gordo; D Sanchez-Morillo; F Pelayo Valle
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Temporal Envelope Coding of the Human Auditory Nerve Inferred from Electrocochleography: Comparison with Envelope Following Responses.

Authors:  Jessica Chen; Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-10

6.  Hearing threshold prediction with Auditory Steady State Responses and estimation of correction functions to compensate for differences with behavioral data, in adult subjects. Part 1: Audera and CHARTR EP devices.

Authors:  Stavros Hatzopoulos; Joseph Petruccelli; Lech Śliwa; Wiesław W Jędrzejczak; Krzysztof Kochanek; Henryk Skarżyński
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-07

7.  The Influence of Sensation Level on Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; Jen Birstler; Adrienne Harrison; Susan Scollie; David Purcell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Brainstem correlates of cochlear nonlinearity measured via the scalp-recorded frequency-following response.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Shaum Bhagat
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 1.703

9.  Using auditory steady-state responses for measuring hearing protector occlusion effect.

Authors:  Olivier Valentin; Frédéric Laville
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.867

10.  Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation.

Authors:  Olivier Valentin; Sasha M John; Frédéric Laville
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.