Literature DB >> 7758270

Spatial language and spatial representation.

W G Hayward1, M J Tarr.   

Abstract

This study explores the commonalities between linguistic and visual representations of space. In particular, because common types of spatial relations, specifically closed-class spatial forms in language and qualitative spatial relations in perception, have been proposed in both representational systems, we investigate whether they share underlying structural similarities. Moreover, while visual spatial relations are a basic element of several theories of object representation, they have been characterized mainly in terms of their linguistic counterparts and without direct evidence about their organization. In order to illuminate the nature of these structures, as well as demonstrate possible correspondences between the two systems, we compare how the spatial relationship between pairs of objects in a scene is encoded linguistically and visually. Spatial language was investigated by having subjects either generate (Experiment 1) or rate the applicability of (Experiment 2) spatial terms for describing the spatial relationship between object pairs. Both the frequency of use and the applicability of spatial terms were highest when the two objects were in vertical or in horizontal alignment. Spatial representation was investigated by paradigms in which subjects either recalled the position of one object relative to the other (Experiment 3) or judged whether one object presented sequentially was in the same or a different position relative to the other (Experiment 4). The accuracy of position estimates and the sensitivity to shifts in position were both highest when the rated object was in a spatial location where spatial terms had been judged to have high applicability in Experiments 1 and 2. These results indicate that the structure of space as encoded by language may be determined by the structure of spatial relations in visual representation.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7758270     DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00643-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  28 in total

1.  Using spatial terms to select an object.

Authors:  L A Carlson; G D Logan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-09

2.  Partner orientation and speaker's knowledge as conflicting parameters in language production.

Authors:  H M Buhl
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2001-11

3.  A neurobehavioral model of flexible spatial language behaviors.

Authors:  John Lipinski; Sebastian Schneegans; Yulia Sandamirskaya; John P Spencer; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 4.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

5.  Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems.

Authors:  Lawrence W Barsalou
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Source-goal asymmetries in motion representation: Implications for language production and comprehension.

Authors:  Anna Papafragou
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-08-01

7.  Spatial Language and the Embedded Listener Model in Parents' Input to Children.

Authors:  Katrina Ferrara; Malena Silva; Colin Wilson; Barbara Landau
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-12-31

8.  Spatial representation by young infants: categorization of spatial relations or sensitivity to a crossing primitive?

Authors:  Paul C Quinn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

9.  Neural substrates of processing path and manner information of a moving event.

Authors:  Denise H Wu; Anne Morganti; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Spatial term apprehension with a reference object's rotation in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  Takatsugu Kojima; Takashi Kusumi
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-09-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.