Literature DB >> 7755515

Etiology of individual differences in reading performance: a test of sex limitation.

M Alarcón1, J C DeFries, D W Fulker.   

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that the etiology of individual differences in reading performance differs in males and females, reading performance data from twin pairs tested in the Colorado Learning Disabilities Research Center were fitted to structural equation models of sex limitation. The sample included 513 pairs of twins in which at least one member of each pair has a positive school history of reading problems [228 monozygotic (MZ), 176 same-sex dizygotic (DZ), and 109 opposite-sex DZ pairs] and 302 matched control pairs [148 MZ, 98 same-sex DZ, and 56 opposite-sex DZ pairs]. Estimates of the genetic correlation between performance in males and females were obtained by analysis of data from both same-sex and opposite-sex twin pairs (Neale and Cardon, 1992). The full model fit the data well (chi 2 = 17.74, df = 16, p = 0.340), and the resulting genetic parameter estimates were highly similar in males and females in both the proband and the control samples. The correlations between genetic influences in males and females do not differ among groups (change in chi 2 = 0.95, df = 1, p > or = 0.25), and the resulting pooled estimate is about .5. Thus, results of this analysis suggest that the etiology of individual differences in reading performance may differ to some extent in males and females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7755515     DOI: 10.1007/BF02197238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  17 in total

1.  Gender ratios among reading-disabled children and their siblings as a function of parental impairment.

Authors:  S J Wadsworth; J C DeFries; J Stevenson; J W Gilger; B F Pennington
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 8.982

2.  Evidence for a genetic aetiology in reading disability of twins.

Authors:  J C DeFries; D W Fulker; M C LaBuda
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Oct 8-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Model-fitting approaches to the analysis of human behaviour.

Authors:  L J Eaves; K A Last; P A Young; N G Martin
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  The diagnosis of twin zygosity.

Authors:  R C Nichols; W C Bilbro
Journal:  Acta Genet Stat Med       Date:  1966

Review 5.  Gender differences in intelligence, language, visual-motor abilities, and academic achievement in students with learning disabilities: a review of the literature.

Authors:  S A Vogel
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  1990-01

6.  Gender and reading disability.

Authors:  P T Ackerman; R A Dykman
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  1993-10

7.  Cerebral lateralization. Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: I. A hypothesis and a program for research.

Authors:  N Geschwind; A M Galaburda
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1985-05

Review 8.  The sex ratios of dyslexic children and their sibs.

Authors:  W H James
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.449

9.  Unexpected sex-ratios in families of language/learning-impaired children.

Authors:  P Tallal; R Ross; S Curtiss
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls. Results of the Connecticut Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  S E Shaywitz; B A Shaywitz; J M Fletcher; M D Escobar
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990 Aug 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  DeFries-Fulker analysis of longitudinal reading performance data from twin pairs ascertained for reading difficulties and from their nontwin siblings.

Authors:  Raven L Astrom; Sally J Wadsworth; Richard K Olson; Erik G Willcutt; John C DeFries
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 2.805

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.