Literature DB >> 370072

Model-fitting approaches to the analysis of human behaviour.

L J Eaves, K A Last, P A Young, N G Martin.   

Abstract

Model-fitting methods are now prominent in the analysis of human behavioural variation. Various ways of specifying models have been proposed. These are identical in their simplest form but differ in the emphasis given to more subtle sources of variation. The biometrical genetical approach allows flexibility in the specification of non-additive factors. Given additivity, the approach of path analysis may be used to specify several environmental models in the presence of assortative mating. In many cases the methods should yield identical conclusions. Several statistical methods have been proposed for parameter estimation and hypothesis testing. The most suitable rely on the method of maximum likelihood for the estimation of variance and covariance components. Any multifactorial model can be formulated in these terms. The choice of method will depend chiefly on the design of the experiment and the ease with which a data summary can be obtained without significant loss of information. Examples are given in which the causes of variation show different degrees of detectable complexity. A variety of experimental designs yield behavioural data which illustrate the contribution of additive and non-additive genetical effects, the mating system, sibling and cultural effects, the interaction of genetical effects with age and sex. The discrimination between alternative hypotheses is often difficult. The extension of the approach to the analysis of multiple measurements and discontinuous traits is considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 370072     DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1978.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  124 in total

1.  Genetic and environmental influences of white and gray matter signal contrast: a new phenotype for imaging genetics?

Authors:  Matthew S Panizzon; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Thomas S Kubarych; Chi-Hua Chen; Lisa T Eyler; Bruce Fischl; Carol E Franz; Michael D Grant; Samar Hamza; Amy Jak; Terry L Jernigan; Michael J Lyons; Michael C Neale; Elizabeth C Prom-Wormley; Larry Seidman; Ming T Tsuang; Hao Wu; Hong Xian; Anders M Dale; William S Kremen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The relationship between age at first drug use and teenage drug use liability.

Authors:  J M Meyer; M C Neale
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 3.  Multivariate genetic analysis of sex limitation and G x E interaction.

Authors:  Michael C Neale; Espen Røysamb; Kristen Jacobson
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.587

4.  Conceptual and data-based investigation of genetic influences and brain asymmetry: a twin study of multiple structural phenotypes.

Authors:  Lisa T Eyler; Eero Vuoksimaa; Matthew S Panizzon; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Michael C Neale; Chi-Hua Chen; Amy Jak; Carol E Franz; Michael J Lyons; Wesley K Thompson; Kelly M Spoon; Bruce Fischl; Anders M Dale; William S Kremen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Estimating the sex-specific effects of genes on facial attractiveness and sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Dorian G Mitchem; Alicia M Purkey; Nicholas M Grebe; Gregory Carey; Christine E Garver-Apgar; Timothy C Bates; Rosalind Arden; John K Hewitt; Sarah E Medland; Nicholas G Martin; Brendan P Zietsch; Matthew C Keller
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  Lindon J. Eaves, Ph.D., M.A. (Oxon), D.Sc. Theory-model-data.

Authors:  Hermine H M Maes; Peter K Hatemi; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  The Genetic Association Between Neocortical Volume and General Cognitive Ability Is Driven by Global Surface Area Rather Than Thickness.

Authors:  Eero Vuoksimaa; Matthew S Panizzon; Chi-Hua Chen; Mark Fiecas; Lisa T Eyler; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Donald J Hagler; Bruce Fischl; Carol E Franz; Amy Jak; Michael J Lyons; Michael C Neale; Daniel A Rinker; Wesley K Thompson; Ming T Tsuang; Anders M Dale; William S Kremen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Cortical thickness or grey matter volume? The importance of selecting the phenotype for imaging genetics studies.

Authors:  Anderson M Winkler; Peter Kochunov; John Blangero; Laura Almasy; Karl Zilles; Peter T Fox; Ravindranath Duggirala; David C Glahn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Distinct genetic influences on cortical surface area and cortical thickness.

Authors:  Matthew S Panizzon; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Lisa T Eyler; Terry L Jernigan; Elizabeth Prom-Wormley; Michael Neale; Kristen Jacobson; Michael J Lyons; Michael D Grant; Carol E Franz; Hong Xian; Ming Tsuang; Bruce Fischl; Larry Seidman; Anders Dale; William S Kremen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Are extended twin family designs worth the trouble? A comparison of the bias, precision, and accuracy of parameters estimated in four twin family models.

Authors:  Matthew C Keller; Sarah E Medland; Laramie E Duncan
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.805

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.