Literature DB >> 7754842

Level of consciousness and age as prognostic factors in aneurysmal SAH.

R Deruty1, I Pelissou-Guyotat, C Mottolese, D Amat, L Bognar.   

Abstract

The prognostic value of the level of consciousness and the patient's age for the outcome of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) is studied in 74 patients admitted on day (D) 0 to D3 after aneurysm rupture. For the level of consciousness three groups of patients are compared: grade I+II (alert patients), grade III+IV (drowsy patients), and grade V (comatose patients). For the age, two groups are compared: patients aged under 50, and patients aged 50 and over. The timing of surgery was: D0-D3 51%, D4-D6 20%, D7 and later 18%, and No surgery 11%. The overall management results were: Good (satisfactory result) 43%, Fair (moderately disabled) 18%, Poor (severely disabled+vegetative survival) 19%, and Death 20%. The outcome was strongly related to the level of consciousness, the rates of Good result decreasing from 71% (grades I-II) to 14% (grades III-IV) and to zero (grade V), and the mortality rates increasing respectively from 5% to 14% and 61%. The relationship between outcome and age was less marked: 54% Good result under 50 and 30% over 50. Out of the Grade V group, 56% could be operated upon and 44% died before surgery. No patient from the other two groups died before surgery. The literature concerning the Grading Systems published so far and the various prognostic factors are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7754842     DOI: 10.1007/BF01404840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  20 in total

1.  Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  W E Hunt; R M Hess
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 2.  Cerebral vasospasm and aneurysm surgery.

Authors:  K Sano
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  1983

3.  [Spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage. Plea for a standard evaluation system].

Authors:  M Dautheribes; G Boulard; J Guérin; P Leman
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.553

4.  Clinical assessment of SAH.

Authors:  W E Hunt
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Predicting outcome in individual patients after severe head injury.

Authors:  B Jennett; G Teasdale; R Braakman; J Minderhoud; R Knill-Jones
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-05-15       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Observer variability in grading patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  K W Lindsay; G Teasdale; R P Knill-Jones; L Murray
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Observer variability in assessing impaired consciousness and coma.

Authors:  G Teasdale; R Knill-Jones; J van der Sande
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  One-year outcome in early aneurysm surgery: prediction of outcome.

Authors:  M M Niskanen; J A Hernesniemi; M P Vapalahti; A Kari
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  A simple scoring system for accurate prediction of outcome within four days of a subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Authors:  C J Gerber; D A Lang; G Neil-Dwyer; P W Smith
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Observer variability in assessing the clinical features of subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  K W Lindsay; G M Teasdale; R P Knill-Jones
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales: a systematic review.

Authors:  David S Rosen; R Loch Macdonald
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Factors associated with clinical and radiological status on admission in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Daniel W Zumofen; Michel Roethlisberger; Rita Achermann; Schatlo Bawarjan; Martin N Stienen; Christian Fung; Donato D'Alonzo; Nicolai Maldaner; Andrea Ferrari; Marco V Corniola; Daniel Schoeni; Johannes Goldberg; Daniele Valsecchi; Thomas Robert; Rodolfo Maduri; Martin Seule; Jan-Karl Burkhardt; Serge Marbacher; Philippe Bijlenga; Kristine A Blackham; Heiner C Bucher; Luigi Mariani; Raphael Guzman
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Evaluation of the prognostic indicators of giant intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Prasad S S V Vannemreddy; Ali Nourbakhsh; Anil Nanda
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2011-01

4.  Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: management strategies and clinical outcomes in a regional neuroscience center.

Authors:  Lisa M Flett; Colin S Chandler; David Giddings; Anil Gholkar
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  [Clinical evaluation of subarachnoid hemorrhaging].

Authors:  S Walter
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  A multiparameter panel method for outcome prediction following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Natacha Turck; Laszlo Vutskits; Paola Sanchez-Pena; Xavier Robin; Alexandre Hainard; Marianne Gex-Fabry; Catherine Fouda; Hadiji Bassem; Markus Mueller; Frédérique Lisacek; Louis Puybasset; Jean-Charles Sanchez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage: who remains for surgical treatment in the post-ISAT era?

Authors:  Marta Koźba-Gosztyła; Bogdan Czapiga; Włodzimierz Jarmundowicz
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.318

8.  Effect of treatment modality and cerebral vasospasm agent on patient outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in the elderly aged 75 years and older.

Authors:  Keisuke Ido; Ryota Kurogi; Ai Kurogi; Kunihiro Nishimura; Koichi Arimura; Ataru Nishimura; Nice Ren; Akiko Kada; Ryu Matsuo; Daisuke Onozuka; Akihito Hagihara; So Takagishi; Keitaro Yamagami; Misa Takegami; Yasunobu Nohara; Naoki Nakashima; Masahiro Kamouchi; Isao Date; Takanari Kitazono; Koji Iihara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Has admission blood pressure any prognostic value in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: an emergency department experience.

Authors:  Latif Duran; Kemal Balci; Celal Kati; Hızır Ufuk Akdemir; Ersoy Kocabicak; Canan Doğruel
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in third and fourth decades of life.

Authors:  Su-Yong Kim; Chul-Hee Lee; In Sung Park; Jae Ha Hwang; Soo Hyun Hwang; Jong Woo Han
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-09-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.