| Literature DB >> 26170846 |
Marta Koźba-Gosztyła1, Bogdan Czapiga1, Włodzimierz Jarmundowicz1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Although there have been a number of studies on changes and trends in the management of aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) since publication of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT), no data exist on what category of patients still remains for surgical treatment. Our goal was to investigate the changes that occurred in the characteristics of a population of aSAH patients treated surgically in the post-ISAT period in a single neurosurgical center, with limited availability of endovascular service.Entities:
Keywords: intracranial aneurysms; subarachnoid hemorrhage; surgical clipping; trend
Year: 2015 PMID: 26170846 PMCID: PMC4495139 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2013.37333
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.318
Baseline patients’ characteristics
| Characteristics | No. ( | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Age, median [years] | 53.61 ±1.08 | |
| Female gender | 258 | 64.1 |
| Aneurysm location: | ||
| ACoA | 155 | 38.5 |
| MCA | 152 | 37.8 |
| ICA | 68 | 16.9 |
| PCoA | 7 | 1.7 |
| PA | 13 | 3.2 |
| ACA | 1 | 0.2 |
| AICA | 1 | 0.2 |
| BA | 5 | 1.2 |
| Aneurysm size [mm]: | ||
| Mean | 9.12 ±6.8 | |
| Small (0–5) | 130 | 32.3 |
| Medium (6–10) | 184 | 45.7 |
| Large (11–24) | 63 | 15.6 |
| Giant (= 25) | 25 | 6.2 |
| GCS grade at presentation: | ||
| 3–8 | 119 | 29.6 |
| 9–12 | 60 | 14.9 |
| 13–15 | 223 | 55.4 |
| Hunt-Hess grade at presentation: | ||
| 1 | 55 | 13.6 |
| 2 | 94 | 23.3 |
| 3 | 122 | 30.3 |
| 4 | 65 | 16.1 |
| 5 | 66 | 16.4 |
| Fisher grade: | ||
| 1–3 | 205 | 51 |
| 4 | 197 | 49 |
| Outcome (discharge GOS): | ||
| 5 | 141 | 35.0 |
| 4 | 98 | 24.3 |
| 3 | 61 | 15.1 |
| 2 | 21 | 5.2 |
| 1 (death) | 81 | 20.1 |
Changes and trends in characteristics of aSAH patients, 2004–2011
| Characteristics | Years | χ2 | Value of | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | d | |||||
| Number of admissions |
| 69 | 70 | 82 | 43 | 31 | 36 | 39 | 32 | 56.43 | < 0.0001 | ||
| % | 17.16 | 17.41 | 20.40 | 10.70 | 7.71 | 8.96 | 9.70 | 7.96 | 7 | ||||
| Aneurysm location | ACoA |
| 25 | 24 | 29 | 13 | 15 | 17 | 16 | 16 | 3.17 | 0.7868 | |
| % | 36.23 | 34.29 | 35.37 | 30.23 | 48.39 | 47.22 | 41.03 | 50.00 | 6 | ||||
| ICA |
| 12 | 12 | 14 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 4 | 5.24 | 0.5133 | ||
| % | 17.39 | 17.14 | 17.07 | 20.93 | 12.90 | 8.33 | 25.64 | 12.50 | 6 | ||||
| MCA |
| 28 | 30 | 32 | 17 | 12 | 12 | 10 | 11 | 1.37 | 0.9677 | ||
| % | 40.58 | 42.86 | 39.02 | 39.53 | 38.71 | 33.33 | 25.64 | 34.38 | 6 | ||||
| PCoA |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ( | ( | ||
| % | 2.90 | 1.43 | 2.44 | 2.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.56 | 0.00 | |||||
| PA |
| 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | ( | ( | ||
| % | 0.00 | 2.86 | 3.66 | 6.98 | 0.00 | 8.33 | 5.13 | 0.00 | |||||
| ACA |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ( | ( | ||
| % | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.12 | |||||
| AICA |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ( | ( | ||
| % | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| BA |
| 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ( | ( | ||
| % | 1.45 | 1.43 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| Aneurysm size [mm] | 1–5 |
| 24 | 22 | 18 | 16 | 12 | 14 | 15 | 9 | 6.54 | 0.3658 | |
| % | 34.78 | 31.43 | 21.95 | 37.21 | 38.71 | 38.89 | 38.46 | 28.12 | 6 | ||||
| 6–10 |
| 24 | 28 | 40 | 22 | 12 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 3.34 | 0.7649 | ||
| % | 34.78 | 40.00 | 48.78 | 51.16 | 38.71 | 55.56 | 51.28 | 56.25 | 6 | ||||
| 11–24 |
| 15 | 13 | 16 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4.98 | 0.5461 | ||
| % | 21.74 | 18.57 | 19.51 | 6.98 | 19.35 | 5.56 | 10.26 | 12.50 | 6 | ||||
| ≥ 25 |
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ( | ( | ||
| % | 8.70 | 10.00 | 9.76 | 4.65 | 3.23 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.12 | |||||
| H-H grade at presentation | 1–3 |
| 46 | 48 | 47 | 27 | 28 | 21 | 33 | 21 | 16.73 | 0.0103 | |
| % | 66.67 | 68.57 | 57.32 | 62.79 | 90.32 | 58.33 | 84.62 | 65.62 | 6 | ||||
| 4–5 |
| 23 | 22 | 35 | 16 | 3 | 15 | 6 | 11 | 16.73 | 0.0103 | ||
| % | 33.33 | 31.43 | 42.68 | 37.21 | 9.68 | 41.67 | 15.38 | 34.38 | 6 | ||||
| GCS grade at presentation | 3–8 |
| 17 | 22 | 31 | 15 | 2 | 14 | 6 | 12 | 18.27 | 0.0056 | |
| % | 24.64 | 31.43 | 37.80 | 34.88 | 6.45 | 38.89 | 15.38 | 37.50 | 6 | ||||
| 9–15 |
| 52 | 48 | 51 | 28 | 29 | 22 | 33 | 20 | 18.27 | 0.0056 | ||
| % | 75.36 | 68.57 | 62.20 | 65.12 | 93.55 | 61.11 | 84.62 | 62.50 | 6 | ||||
| Fisher grade at presentation | 1–3 |
| 33 | 33 | 36 | 27 | 20 | 18 | 24 | 14 | 8.25 | 0.2205 | |
| % | 47.83 | 47.14 | 43.90 | 62.79 | 64.52 | 50.00 | 61.54 | 43.75 | 6 | ||||
| 4 |
| 36 | 37 | 46 | 16 | 11 | 18 | 15 | 18 | 8.25 | 0.2205 | ||
| % | 52.17 | 52.86 | 56.10 | 37.21 | 35.48 | 50.00 | 38.46 | 56.25 | 6 | ||||
| GOS grade at discharge | 1–3 |
| 22 | 30 | 43 | 18 | 7 | 18 | 13 | 12 | 13.52 | 0.0355 | |
| % | 31.88 | 42.86 | 52.44 | 41.86 | 22.58 | 50.00 | 33.33 | 37.50 | 6 | ||||
| 4–5 |
| 47 | 40 | 39 | 25 | 24 | 18 | 26 | 20 | 13.52 | 0.0355 | ||
| % | 68.12 | 57.14 | 47.56 | 58.14 | 77.42 | 50.00 | 66.67 | 62.50 | 6 | ||||
| Deaths |
| 12 | 17 | 21 | 9 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 4.22 | 0.6466 | ||
| % | 17.39 | 24.29 | 25.61 | 20.93 | 12.90 | 22.22 | 12.82 | 15.62 | 6 | ||||
Values not established due to the small study sample.
Figure 1Number of ruptured cerebral aneurysms treated surgically from 2004 to 2011
Figure 2Mean patients’ age at admission, 2004–2011
Figure 3Patients’ clinical and radiological presentation at admission assessed applying Hunt-Hess and Fisher grade, 2004–2011
Figure 4Glasgow Outcome Scale at discharge and mortality rate, 2004–2011
Figure 5Percentage of anterior communicating artery (ACoA), middle cerebral artery (MCA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms treated surgically, 2004–2011
Figure 6Percentage of small (0–5 mm), medium (6–10 mm) and large (11–24 mm) aneurysms treated surgically, 2004–2011