Literature DB >> 7750366

Families created by the new reproductive technologies: quality of parenting and social and emotional development of the children.

S Golombok1, R Cook, A Bish, C Murray.   

Abstract

The creation of families by means of the new reproductive technologies has raised important questions about the psychological consequences for children, particularly where gamete donation has been used in the child's conception. Findings are presented of a study of family relationships and the social and emotional development of children in families created as a result of the 2 most widely used reproductive technologies, in vitro fertilization (IVF) and donor insemination (DI), in comparison with control groups of families with a naturally conceived child and adoptive families. The quality of parenting was assessed using a standardized interview with the mother, and mothers and fathers completed questionnaire measures of stress associated with parenting, marital satisfaction, and emotional state. Data on children's psychiatric state were also obtained by standardized interview with the mother, and by questionnaires completed by the mothers and the children's teachers. The children were administered the Separation Anxiety Test, the Family Relations Test, and the Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance. The results showed that the quality of parenting in families with a child conceived by assisted conception is superior to that shown by families with a naturally conceived child. No group differences were found for any of the measures of children's emotions, behavior, or relationships with parents. The findings are discussed in terms of their implications for understanding the role of genetic ties in family functioning and child development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7750366     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00871.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  16 in total

1.  What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Paul Schotsmans; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2004

2.  Privacy versus disclosure in gamete donation: a clash of interest, of duties, or an exercise in responsibility?

Authors:  E Shenfield
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Parenting and secrecy issues related to children of assisted reproduction.

Authors:  S Golombok
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  To name or not to name? An overview of the social and ethical issues raised by removing anonymity from sperm donors.

Authors:  Jennifer A Burr
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Family Change in Global Perspective: How and Why Family Systems Change.

Authors:  Frank F Furstenberg
Journal:  Fam Relat       Date:  2019-05-23

6.  Gamete donation, information sharing and the best interests of the child: an overview of the psychosocial evidence.

Authors:  Tabitha Freeman
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015-03

7.  Psychomotor development of children born after preimplantation genetic diagnosis and parental stress evaluation.

Authors:  Loretta Thomaidis; Sophia Kitsiou-Tzeli; Elena Critselis; Hera Drandakis; Vassiliki Touliatou; Stelios Mantoudis; Eleni Leze; Aspasia Destouni; Joanne Traeger-Synodinos; Dimitrios Kafetzis; Emmanouel Kanavakis
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.764

8.  Attitudes of IVF parents regarding the IVF experience and their children.

Authors:  D A Greenfeld; S I Ort; D G Greenfeld; E E Jones; D L Olive
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  An overview of studies on psychological well-being in children born following assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Qi-tao Zhan; Pei-pei Pan; Xiang-rong Xu; Hang-ying Lou; Yi-yun Lou; Fan Jin
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.066

10.  Cognitive development following ART: effect of choice of comparison group, confounding and mediating factors.

Authors:  C Carson; J J Kurinczuk; A Sacker; Y Kelly; R Klemetti; M Redshaw; M A Quigley
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.