Literature DB >> 7748636

General practitioners' views on continuing medical education.

M H Kelly1, T S Murray.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 1990 contract for general practitioners altered the provision of continuing medical education. AIM: This study set out to examine doctors' experiences of postgraduate education before and after the contract and their preferences for the provision of postgraduate education.
METHOD: In 1991 a structured questionnaire was sent to 1959 doctors registered on the database held by the west of Scotland postgraduate office.
RESULTS: An 82% response rate was obtained. Eighty eight questionnaires had to be excluded. Of 1523 respondents, 74% were entitled to study leave under the terms of their practice agreement, an increase of 15% since the introduction of the contract. When attending courses 11% reported that they always employed a locum (32% occasionally). Those who did so were more likely to be general practitioners in rural areas than in urban or mixed areas. Almost all respondents (1485, 98%) had participated in postgraduate education since April 1990. Lectures remained popular (47% of respondents indicated it was their preferred or most preferred choice) while distance learning and practice based learning were least preferred. Evening meetings and afternoon meetings were the most popular, and Wednesday and Thursday were reported to be the most suitable days for educational meetings.
CONCLUSION: Organizing education for a large number of people is difficult, but individuals' preferences and difficulties have emerged which must be taken into account when doing so. In terms of attendance, postgraduate education seems to have been a success although its value in influencing quality of care is more doubtful. Perhaps the development of personal education plans may make learning more useful and relevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7748636      PMCID: PMC1239022     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  10 in total

1.  Is there a future for general practice postgraduate education? ?

Authors:  D Wall; G Houghton
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-08

2.  Continuing educational requirements for general practitioners in Grampian.

Authors:  G G Shirriffs
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-05

3.  General practitioners' continuing medical education within and outside their practice.

Authors:  P A Owen; L A Allery; K G Harding; T M Hayes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-07-22

4.  Continuing education: a survey among general practitioners.

Authors:  J M Forrest; M McKenna; I M Stanley; N T Boaden; G T Woodcock
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.267

5.  Survey of general practitioners' views on postgraduate education in North-east Scotland.

Authors:  D Durno; G M Gill
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1974-09

6.  Continuing education in general practice in England and Wales.

Authors:  H W Acheson
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1974-09

7.  Postgraduate education for general practitioners in the Manchester Region.

Authors:  P S Byrne
Journal:  Br J Med Educ       Date:  1969-03

8.  Who are the providers of postgraduate medical education?

Authors:  M H Kelly; T S Murray
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  The general practitioner and continuing education.

Authors:  A J Pickup; L G Mee; A J Hedley
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1983-08

10.  Continuing medical education for general practitioners--a Northern Ireland plan.

Authors:  A McKnight; K Mills
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1992-10
  10 in total
  10 in total

1.  GP selection of postgraduate education courses has implications for colleagues: messages for course providers and for those writing practice professional development plans.

Authors:  A Woodcock; P White; H Smith; C Coles; C Campion-Smith; T Stannard
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  University of California Commission on the Future of Medical Education. July 1997. Final report.

Authors: 
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-05

3.  Continuing medical education for pathologists: an evaluation of the Royal College of Pathologists' Wessex pilot scheme.

Authors:  C du Boulay
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Improving continuing medical education and addressing the challenge of instituting reaccreditation.

Authors:  R Westcott
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Hospital grand rounds in family medicine. Content and educational structure.

Authors:  R Lewkonia; M Sosnowski; F Murray
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Motivation of general practitioners attending postgraduate education.

Authors:  M H Kelly; T S Murray
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Continuing medical education in mental illness: a paradox for general practitioners.

Authors:  A Singleton; A Tylee
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Learners' experience of continuing medical education events: a qualitative study of GP principals in Dorset.

Authors:  C Campion-Smith; H Smith; P White; E Baker; R Baker; I Holloway
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Improving knowledge and changing behavior towards guideline based decisions in diabetes care: a controlled intervention study of a team-based learning approach for continuous professional development of physicians.

Authors:  Lisa Kühne-Eversmann; Martin R Fischer
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-01-15

10.  Development and Evaluation of a New Serious Game for Continuing Medical Education of General Practitioners (Hygie): Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Louis-Baptiste Jaunay; Philippe Zerr; Lino Peguin; Léandre Renouard; Anne-Sophie Ivanoff; Hervé Picard; James Griffith; Olivier Chassany; Martin Duracinsky
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.428

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.