Literature DB >> 7744442

Assessment of the periotest device in baseline mobility measurements of craniofacial implants.

K Derhami1, J F Wolfaardt, G Faulkner, M Grace.   

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate reliability of the Periotest instrument in baseline mobility measurement of craniofacial implants in a human wet bone specimen. Sixteen 4.0-mm craniofacial Brånemark implants were placed in the most common sites for craniofacial implant placement. A 5.5-mm abutment was attached to each implant except one in the mastoid bone, which was connected with a bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) abutment. Baseline Periotest values (PTVs) were recorded on each abutment at different vertical measurement points by three different clinicians using three Periotest devices. Baseline PTVs for each abutment ranged between -1.23 and -5.90. Interoperator and interinstrumental variability did not influence PTVs; however, the vertical measurement point on the abutment proved to have a strong effect on PTV recordings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7744442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  12 in total

1.  Assessment of Osstell™ and Periotest® systems in measuring dental implant stability (in vitro study).

Authors:  Samer Al-Jetaily; Abdullah Alfarraj Al-Dosari
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2010-11-13

2.  [Primary soft tissue coverage and specific after-care of endosseous implants in pre-irradiated orbits].

Authors:  S Tveten; T Weischer; C Mohr
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  1997-09

3.  Highly Nonlinear Solitary Waves for the Assessment of Dental Implant Mobility.

Authors:  Bruk Berhanu; Piervincenzo Rizzo; Mark Ochs
Journal:  J Appl Mech       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 2.168

4.  Assessing qualitative changes in simulated periodontal ligament and alveolar bone using a non-contact electromagnetic vibration device.

Authors:  Chiaki Kobayashi; Makoto Hayashi; Masaru Yamaoka; Kazuhiro Hashimoto; Takeshi Kato; Norio Komori; Bunnai Ogiso
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  A comparative study on the accuracy of the devices for measuring the implant stability.

Authors:  In-Ho Cho; Young-Il Lee; Young-Mi Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Comparion of stability in titanium implants with different surface topographies in dogs.

Authors:  Nam-Sook Kim; Mong-Sook Vang; Hong-So Yang; Sang-Won Park; Ha-Ok Park; Hyun-Pil Lim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  A comparative study on the initial stability of different implants placed above the bone level using resonance frequency analysis.

Authors:  In-Ho Kang; Chang-Whe Kim; Young-Jun Lim; Myung-Joo Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Assessment of Osstell ISQ's reliability for implant stability measurement: a cross-sectional clinical study.

Authors:  Mariano Herrero-Climent; Rocio Santos-García; Reyes Jaramillo-Santos; Manuel-Maria Romero-Ruiz; Ana Fernández-Palacin; Pedro Lázaro-Calvo; Pedro Bullón; Jose-Vicente Ríos-Santos
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-11-01

9.  Mathematical evaluation of the influence of multiple factors on implant stability quotient values in clinical practice: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Hairong Huang; Daniel Wismeijer; Xianhong Shao; Gang Wu
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Damping ratio analysis of tooth stability under various simulated degrees of vertical alveolar bone loss and different root types.

Authors:  Kuo-Ning Ho; Sheng-Yang Lee; Haw-Ming Huang
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.