Literature DB >> 9410640

[Primary soft tissue coverage and specific after-care of endosseous implants in pre-irradiated orbits].

S Tveten1, T Weischer, C Mohr.   

Abstract

After orbital exenteration and high- dose irradiation (60 Gy on average), 17 endosseous implants were placed periorbitally in 5 patients. No hyperbaric oxygen therapy was performed. All implants were primarily covered with regional or free flaps. After second-stage surgery and aesthetic rehabilitation with an external maxillofacial prosthesis, the pocket depth and implant stability (periotest) were checked, an occipitonasomental radiograph was taken and the soft tissue assessed in short recall intervals. When the implant was uncovered, osseointegration was stable. Within a follow-up period of 35 months, no fixation had failed. In two patients, peri-implant inflammation (microbiologically confirmed Staphylococcus aureus) occurred, which was clinically only determined by soft tissue oedema and rubor. The results demonstrate primary soft tissue covering as essential for non-irritating implant osseointegration in the irradiated orbita. In extraoral implants the clinical estimation of the peri-implant soft tissue, including a microbiological examination, is required for early detection of peri-implant inflammation in order to avoid secondary implant failure. In contrast, periotest and pocket depth are not relevant in recognizing an ensuing peri-implant inflammation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9410640     DOI: 10.1007/BF03043569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir        ISSN: 1432-9417


  15 in total

1.  Extraoral application of osseointegrated implants.

Authors:  D E Tolman; R P Desjardins
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Osseointegration in maxillofacial prosthetics. Part II: Extraoral applications.

Authors:  S M Parel; P I Branemark; A Tjellstrom; G Gion
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Integration of titanium implants in irradiated bone. Histologic and clinical study.

Authors:  M Jacobsson; A Tjellström; P Thomsen; T Albrektsson; I Turesson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.547

4.  Stabilization of craniofacial prostheses using osseointegrated titanium implants.

Authors:  P K Moy; S Lundgren; J Beumer; D Castro
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Surgical considerations for endosseous implants in the craniofacial region: a 3-year report.

Authors:  S Lundgren; P K Moy; J Beumer; S Lewis
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.789

6.  Osseointegrated titanium implants for the attachment of facial prostheses.

Authors:  H McComb
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  The United States and Swedish experience with osseointegration and facial prostheses.

Authors:  S M Parel; A Tjellström
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Evaluation of the peri-implant epithelial tissue of percutaneous implant abutments supporting maxillofacial prostheses.

Authors:  C A Gitto; W G Plata; N G Schaaf
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  A retrospective study of osseointegrated skin-penetrating titanium fixtures used for retaining facial prostheses.

Authors:  M Jacobsson; A Tjellstrom; L Fine; H Andersson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Assessment of the periotest device in baseline mobility measurements of craniofacial implants.

Authors:  K Derhami; J F Wolfaardt; G Faulkner; M Grace
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.