Literature DB >> 7736720

Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention.

G D Logan1.   

Abstract

A theory of voluntary, top-down control of visual spatial attention is presented that explains how linguistic cues like "above," "below," "left," and "right" are used to direct attention from one object to another. The theory distinguishes between perceptual and conceptual representations of space and views attention as a set of mechanisms that establish correspondences between the representations. Spatial reference frames play an important part in this analysis. The theory interprets reference frames as mechanisms of attention, similar to spatial indices but with more computational power. The theory was tested in 11 experiments that assessed the importance of linguistic distinctions between classes of spatial relations (basic, deictic, and intrinsic) and examined the flexibility with which subjects manipulated spatial reference frames.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7736720     DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1995.1004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  26 in total

1.  Using spatial terms to select an object.

Authors:  L A Carlson; G D Logan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-09

2.  A neurobehavioral model of flexible spatial language behaviors.

Authors:  John Lipinski; Sebastian Schneegans; Yulia Sandamirskaya; John P Spencer; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Viewpoint alignment and response conflict during spatial judgment.

Authors:  Myeong-Ho Sohn; Richard A Carlson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

4.  Evidence for mental subdivision of space by infants: 3- to 4-month-olds spontaneously bisect a small-scale area into left and right categories.

Authors:  Paul C Quinn
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

5.  Coordinating spatial referencing using shared gaze.

Authors:  Mark B Neider; Xin Chen; Christopher A Dickinson; Susan E Brennan; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

6.  The effect of occlusion on the semantics of projective spatial terms: a case study in grounding language in perception.

Authors:  John D Kelleher; Robert J Ross; Colm Sloan; Brian Mac Namee
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-12-08

7.  Spatial Language and the Embedded Listener Model in Parents' Input to Children.

Authors:  Katrina Ferrara; Malena Silva; Colin Wilson; Barbara Landau
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-12-31

8.  Automatic, stimulus-driven attentional capture by objecthood.

Authors:  Ruth Kimchi; Yaffa Yeshurun; Aliza Cohen-Savransky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

9.  Why don't we see changes?: The role of attentional bottlenecks and limited visual memory.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Andrea Reinecke; Peter Brawn
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2006

10.  Egocentric spatial framework effects from single and multiple points of view.

Authors:  R H Maki; M N Marek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.