Literature DB >> 2399307

Storage phosphor versus screen-film radiography: effect of varying exposure parameters and unsharp mask filtering on the detectability of cortical bone defects.

M Prokop1, M Galanski, J W Oestmann, U von Falkenhausen, H Rosenthal, P Reimer, J Nischelsky, S Reichelt.   

Abstract

Diagnostic performance with storage phosphor radiography is influenced by exposure parameters and digital filtering algorithms. The authors compared the detectability of cortical lesions in excised human femoral shafts on state-of-the-art screen-film radiographs and storage phosphor digital radiographs. For the digital system, the effect of varying exposure parameters (photon flux and tube voltage) and unsharp mask filtering (kernel size and enhancement factor) was tested. Analysis of receiver operating characteristics was performed for 10,560 observations made by eight radiologists. Under identical exposure conditions, storage phosphor imaging yielded no significant advantages over conventional screen-film radiography. Although large variations in exposure dose are possible with storage phosphors, the potential for dose reduction was limited even by means of an increase in tube voltage. The performance with unsharp masked images declined with decreasing kernel size and pronounced enhancement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2399307     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.177.1.2399307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  5 in total

1.  Visualization of multimodal image information in medicine.

Authors:  K H Englmeier; U Fink; T Hilbertz
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1992

2.  Support line and tube visibility in chest examinations using computed radiography.

Authors:  W Huda; C J Belden; L A Webb; C K Palmer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  A comparison of hard and soft copies processed with linear conversion and nonlinear conversion of skeletal fractures--a preliminary study.

Authors:  T Kaji; M Katayama; S Kosuda; S Kusano
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Computed radiography excretory urography: can the system sensitivity value be used as an image quality indicator?

Authors:  K Andoh; K Odagiri; T Matsumoto; K Yamashita; I Ogino; T Otsuka
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Comparison of stimulable phosphor technology and conventional screen-film technology in pediatric scoliosis.

Authors:  D A Stringer; R A Cairns; K J Poskitt; H Bray; R Milner; B Kennedy
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1994
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.