Literature DB >> 7733698

Up to thirty-year survival after aortic valve replacement in the small aortic root.

G W He1, G L Grunkemeier, H L Gately, A P Furnary, A Starr.   

Abstract

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) in the small aortic root has been reported to be associated with obstruction of left ventricular output. This study was designed to investigate the determinants of long-term survival after the implantation of small size prostheses. From September 1961 to December 1993, 2,977 patients underwent isolated aortic valve replacement at our institution. Of these patients, 447 who were older than 18 years received small size (21 mm or less) prostheses. Long-term survival was investigated in the 404 patients who survived operation (more than 30 days) with 92% follow-up completeness (mean +/- deviation 7.1 +/- 6.4; maximum, 31 years). The age was younger than 50 years in 62 patients, 50 to 59 years in 60, 60 to 69 years in 99, 70 to 79 years in 138, and 80 to 94 years in 45; 67% were men. Thirty patients (7%) had previous AVR. Prosthesis usage included early Starr-Edwards models in 130 (32%), current Starr-Edwards (model 1260 since 1969) in 50 (12%), Carpentier-Edwards (porcine) in 113 (28%), and other prostheses in 111 patients (27%). One hundred sixteen patients (26%) had concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Eleven variables (age divided as above, sex, preoperative functional class, body surface area [BSA], small BSA [less than 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, or 1.9 m2], period of operation, previous AVR, type of prosthesis, size of prosthesis, concomitant CABG, and re-replacement) were investigated with regard to the long-term survival by the Kaplan-Meier method, and age, concomitant CABG, and type of prosthesis were significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7733698     DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00075-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  11 in total

1.  [Hemodynamic evaluations of patients with small aortic annulus with St. Jude Medical prosthetic heart valve].

Authors:  T Shimabukuro; Y Takeuchi; A Gomi; H Nakatani; Y Suda; K Kono; N Nagano
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-12

Review 2.  Thirty-seven-year durability of a Starr-Edwards aortic prosthesis: case report and brief review of the literature.

Authors:  Mehmet Ozkokeli; Mehmet Ates; Abdurrahman Ekinci; Murat Akcar
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2005

3.  A nineteen-millimetre aortic valve prosthesis: is this really a risk?

Authors:  P Lipiec; L Noyez; R M H J Brouwer
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Reoperation for a Starr-Edwards aortic prosthetic valve 33 years after initial implantation.

Authors:  Takahiko Misumi; Mikihiko Kudo; Kiyoshi Koizumi; Hiroya Kumamaru
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-03

5.  Speckle tracking echocardiography derived 2-dimensional myocardial strain predicts left ventricular function and mass regression in aortic stenosis patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Adam Staron; Manish Bansal; Piyush Kalakoti; Ayumi Nakabo; Zbigniew Gasior; Piotr Pysz; Krystian Wita; Marek Jasinski; Partho P Sengupta
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Comparative evaluation of left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized analysis.

Authors:  Mirko Doss; Jeffrey P Wood; Arndt H Kiessling; Anton Moritz
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 7.  Stentless aortic valve replacement: an update.

Authors:  Junjiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2011-06-02

8.  Hemodynamic behavior of stentless aortic valves in long term follow-up.

Authors:  Torsten Christ; Herko Grubitzsch; Benjamin Claus; Georg Heinze; Simon Dushe; Wolfgang Konertz
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 1.637

9.  Long-Term Results (up to 20 Years) of 19 mm or Smaller Prostheses in the Aortic Position. Does Size Matter? A Propensity-Matched Survival Analysis.

Authors:  Horea Feier; Andrei Grigorescu; Lucian Falnita; Oana Rachita; Marian Gaspar; Constantin T Luca
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Early and mid-term outcome in terms of functional and hemodynamic performance of the st. Jude regent 19-mm aortic mechanical prosthesis versus 19-mm carpentier edwards aortic biological prosthesis.

Authors:  Edvin Prifti; Massimo Bonacchi; Fadil Ademaj; Gabriele Giunti; Giampiero Esposito; Arben Baboci; Gani Bajraktari; Altin Veshti; Aurel Demiraj; Vittorio Vanini
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.