Literature DB >> 7728038

Commentary: scientific heads are not turned by rhetoric.

T Greenhalgh.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1995        PMID： 7728038      PMCID： PMC2549364          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.310.6985.987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  The Lancet's statistical review process: areas for improvement by authors.

Authors:  S M Gore; G Jones; S G Thompson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-07-11       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Authors:  A Taddio; T Pain; F F Fassos; H Boon; A L Ilersich; T R Einarson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  CNRS plays down 'embryo freezing' results.

Authors:  D Butler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-02-16       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Long-term effects of embryo freezing in mice.

Authors:  E Dulioust; K Toyama; M C Busnel; R Moutier; M Carlier; C Marchaland; B Ducot; P Roubertoux; M Auroux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.

Authors:  K F Schulz; I Chalmers; R J Hayes; D G Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 56.272
  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers.

Authors:  M Docherty; R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-08

2.  Reporting the findings of clinical trials: a discussion paper.

Authors:  D Ghersi; M Clarke; J Berlin; Am Gülmezoglu; R Kush; P Lumbiganon; D Moher; F Rockhold; I Sim; E Wager
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  The rhetoric of research. Embrace scientific rhetoric for its power.

Authors:  D Junger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-01

4.  Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutron; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in oncology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Kempf; Jennifer A de Beyer; Jonathan Cook; Jane Holmes; Seid Mohammed; Tri-Long Nguyên; Iveta Simera; Marialena Trivella; Douglas G Altman; Sally Hopewell; Karel G M Moons; Raphael Porcher; Johannes B Reitsma; Willi Sauerbrei; Gary S Collins
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  "Spin" in wound care research: the reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically non-significant primary outcome results or unspecified primary outcomes.

Authors:  Suzanne Lockyer; Rob Hodgson; Jo C Dumville; Nicky Cullum
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.279
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.