Literature DB >> 10231230

The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers.

M Docherty, R Smith.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1999        PMID： 10231230      PMCID： PMC1115625          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.318.7193.1224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  The Lancet's statistical review process: areas for improvement by authors.

Authors:  S M Gore; G Jones; S G Thompson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-07-11       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.

Authors:  C Begg; M Cho; S Eastwood; R Horton; D Moher; I Olkin; R Pitkin; D Rennie; K F Schulz; D Simel; D F Stroup
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-08-28       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Uniform structured formats for scientific communications--how far should we go?

Authors:  M Doherty
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  The rhetoric of research.

Authors:  R Horton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-04-15

6.  Commentary: scientific heads are not turned by rhetoric.

Authors:  T Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-04-15

7.  Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Authors:  A Taddio; T Pain; F F Fassos; H Boon; A L Ilersich; T R Einarson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262
  7 in total
  29 in total

1.  Structuring the discussion of scientific papers. Results of single studies must be assessed in context of relevant systematic reviews.

Authors:  T Jefferson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-28

2.  The function of the discussion section in academic medical writing.

Authors:  J R Skelton; S J Edwards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-06

3.  Guidelines for evaluating papers on educational interventions.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-08

4.  Clinical research in emergency medicine: putting it together.

Authors:  A M T Good; P Driscoll
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Reporting the clinical importance of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  David Moher; Douglas G Altman; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Writing scientific papers for publication: "Without publication research is sterile".

Authors:  M E J Curzon; P E Cleaton-Jones
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2012-02

7.  CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.

Authors:  David Moher; Sally Hopewell; Kenneth F Schulz; Victor Montori; Peter C Gøtzsche; P J Devereaux; Diana Elbourne; Matthias Egger; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-23

Review 8.  Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in clinical research reports.

Authors:  Victor M Montori; Roman Jaeschke; Holger J Schünemann; Mohit Bhandari; Jan L Brozek; P J Devereaux; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-11-06

9.  Guidelines for writing manuscripts about community-based participatory research for peer-reviewed journals.

Authors:  Bryan C Bordeaux; Crystal Wiley; S Darius Tandon; Carol R Horowitz; Pamela Bohrer Brown; Eric B Bass
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2007

10.  "Getting your message through": an editorial guide for meeting publication standards.

Authors:  Kjetil G Ringdal; Hans Morten Lossius; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 2.953
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.