Literature DB >> 7727022

Two in-vivo protocols for testing virucidal efficacy of handwashing and hand disinfection.

J Steinmann1, R Nehrkorn, A Meyer, K Becker.   

Abstract

Whole-hands and fingerpads of seven volunteers were contaminated with poliovirus type 1 Sabin strain in order to evaluate virucidal efficacy of different forms of handwashing and handrub with alcohols and alcohol-based disinfectants. In the whole-hand protocol, handwashing with unmedicated soap for 5 min and handrubbing with 80% ethanol yielded a log reduction factor (RF) of > 2, whereas the log RF by 96.8% ethanol exceeded 3.2. With the fingerpad model ethanol produced a greater log RF than iso- or n-propanol. Comparing five commercial hand disinfectants and a chlorine solution (1.0% chloramine T-solution) for handrub, Desderman and Promanum, both composed of ethanol, yielded log RFs of 2.47 and 2.26 respectively after an application time of 60 s, similar to 1.0% chloramine T-solution (log RF of 2.28). Autosept, Mucasept, and Sterillium, based on n-propanol and/or isopropanol, were found to be significantly less effective (log RFs of 1.16, 1.06 and 1.52 respectively). A comparison of a modified whole-hand and the fingerpad protocol with Promanum showed similar results with the two systems suggesting both models are suitable for testing the in-vivo efficacy of handwashing agents and hand disinfectants which are used without any water.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7727022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed        ISSN: 0934-8859


  9 in total

1.  A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens.

Authors:  Marlene K Wolfe; Daniele S Lantagne
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 2.  Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Axel Kramer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Improved inactivation of nonenveloped enteric viruses and their surrogates by a novel alcohol-based hand sanitizer.

Authors:  David R Macinga; Syed A Sattar; Lee-Ann Jaykus; James W Arbogast
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  In vivo comparison of two human norovirus surrogates for testing ethanol-based handrubs: the mouse chasing the cat!

Authors:  Syed A Sattar; Mohammad Ali; Jason A Tetro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Handwashing and Ebola virus disease outbreaks: A randomized comparison of soap, hand sanitizer, and 0.05% chlorine solutions on the inactivation and removal of model organisms Phi6 and E. coli from hands and persistence in rinse water.

Authors:  Marlene K Wolfe; Karin Gallandat; Kyle Daniels; Anne Marie Desmarais; Pamela Scheinman; Daniele Lantagne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The physiology and pharmacology of singlet oxygen.

Authors:  Thomas W Stief
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.538

7.  Virucidal activity of a new hand disinfectant with reduced ethanol content: comparison with other alcohol-based formulations.

Authors:  A Kramer; A S Galabov; S A Sattar; L Döhner; A Pivert; C Payan; M H Wolff; A Yilmaz; J Steinmann
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 8.  A unified framework for developing effective hygiene procedures for hands, environmental surfaces and laundry in healthcare, domestic, food handling and other settings.

Authors:  Sally F Bloomfield; Philip C Carling; Martin Exner
Journal:  GMS Hyg Infect Control       Date:  2017-06-19

Review 9.  Efficacy of ethanol against viruses in hand disinfection.

Authors:  G Kampf
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.926

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.