Literature DB >> 28654076

A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens.

Marlene K Wolfe1, Daniele S Lantagne2.   

Abstract

Handwashing is widely recommended to prevent infectious disease transmission. However, little comparable evidence exists on the efficacy of handwashing methods in general. Additionally, little evidence exists comparing handwashing methods to determine which are most efficacious at removing infectious pathogens. Research is needed to provide evidence for the different approaches to handwashing that may be employed during infectious disease outbreaks. Here, a laboratory method to assess the efficacy of handwashing methods at removing microorganisms from hands and their persistence in rinse water is described. Volunteers' hands are first spiked with the test organism and then washed with each handwashing method of interest. Generally, surrogate microorganisms are used to protect human subjects from disease. The number of organisms remaining on volunteers' hands after washing is tested using a modified "glove juice" method: the hands are placed in gloves with an eluent and are scrubbed to suspend the microorganisms and make them available for analysis by membrane filtration (bacteria) or plaque assay (viruses/bacteriophages). Rinse water produced from the handwashing is directly collected for analysis. Handwashing efficacy is quantified by comparing the log reduction value between samples taken after handwashing to samples with no handwashing. Rinse water persistence is quantified by comparing rinse water samples from various handwashing methods to samples collected after handwashing with just water. While this method is limited by the need to use surrogate organisms to preserve the safety of human volunteers, it captures aspects of handwashing that are difficult to replicate in an in vitro study and fills research gaps on handwashing efficacy and the persistence of infectious organisms in rinse water.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28654076      PMCID: PMC5608470          DOI: 10.3791/55604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  25 in total

1.  Quantifying the effect of hand wash duration, soap use, ground beef debris, and drying methods on the removal of Enterobacter aerogenes on hands.

Authors:  Dane A Jensen; Michelle D Danyluk; Linda J Harris; Donald W Schaffner
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.077

2.  In-vivo efficacy of hand sanitisers against feline calicivirus: a surrogate for norovirus.

Authors:  S L S Lages; M A Ramakrishnan; S M Goyal
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Reducing viral contamination from finger pads: handwashing is more effective than alcohol-based hand disinfectants.

Authors:  E Tuladhar; W C Hazeleger; M Koopmans; M H Zwietering; E Duizer; R R Beumer
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  The hand eczema severity index (HECSI): a scoring system for clinical assessment of hand eczema. A study of inter- and intraobserver reliability.

Authors:  E Held; R Skoet; J D Johansen; T Agner
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.302

5.  Effect of testing method on apparent activities of antiviral disinfectants and antiseptics.

Authors:  J D Woolwine; J L Gerberding
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Microbiological evaluation of two hand hygiene procedures achieved by healthcare workers during routine patient care: a randomized study.

Authors:  G Kac; I Podglajen; M Gueneret; S Vaupré; A Bissery; G Meyer
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Effectiveness of liquid soap and hand sanitizer against Norwalk virus on contaminated hands.

Authors:  Pengbo Liu; Yvonne Yuen; Hui-Mien Hsiao; Lee-Ann Jaykus; Christine Moe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Hand hygiene with soap and water is superior to alcohol rub and antiseptic wipes for removal of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Matthew T Oughton; Vivian G Loo; Nandini Dendukuri; Susan Fenn; Michael D Libman
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.254

9.  Two in-vivo protocols for testing virucidal efficacy of handwashing and hand disinfection.

Authors:  J Steinmann; R Nehrkorn; A Meyer; K Becker
Journal:  Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed       Date:  1995-01

10.  Efficacy of selected hand hygiene agents used to remove Bacillus atrophaeus (a surrogate of Bacillus anthracis) from contaminated hands.

Authors:  David J Weber; Emily Sickbert-Bennett; Maria F Gergen; William A Rutala
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  Enhancement of Antibacterial Performance of Silver Nanowire Transparent Film by Post-Heat Treatment.

Authors:  Ji-Hyeon Kim; Junfei Ma; Sungjin Jo; Seunghun Lee; Chang Su Kim
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.076

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.