Literature DB >> 21882088

High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of rotator cuff tears using a microscopy coil: noninvasive detection without intraarticular contrast material.

Shin Hitachi1, Kei Takase, Minoru Tanaka, Yuichi Tojo, Shiro Tabata, Kazuhiro Majima, Shuichi Higano, Shoki Takahashi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a microscopy coil for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears by comparing the method to conventional MRI and MRI arthrography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 68 shoulders were prospectively studied using a 1.5-T MRI unit. Conventional MRI scans were obtained with a surface coil and high-resolution MRI scans with a microscopy coil. MRI arthrography was performed in 28 shoulders using a surface coil. MRI evaluation of tears of rotator cuff tendons was compared with arthroscopic findings and surgical results.
RESULTS: The surgery revealed 40 full-thickness tears, 13 partial-thickness tears, and 15 intact cuffs. In all, 35 (88%) full-thickness tears were correctly diagnosed on conventional MRI and 40 (100%) on high-resolution MRI. MR arthrography delineated 11 of 12 (92%) full-thickness tears. Altogether, 5 (38%) of the partial-thickness tears were detected on conventional MRI, and 12 (92%) were clearly demonstrated on high-resolution MRI. MRI arthrography depicted three (60%) of five partial-thickness tears. High-resolution MRI showed higher sensitivity than conventional MRI (P < 0.05) and had values equivalent to those of MRI arthrography for diagnosing partial-thickness tears.
CONCLUSION: High-resolution MRI with a microscopy coil is a feasible, noninvasive technique for diagnosing rotator cuff tears.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21882088     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-011-0583-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  32 in total

1.  Fat-suppressed fast spin-echo mid-TE (TE[effective]=34) MR images: comparison with fast spin-echo T2-weighted images for the diagnosis of tears and anatomic variants of the glenoid labrum.

Authors:  M J Tuite; T J Shinners; M C Hollister; J F Orwin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  3.0-T MRI of the supraspinatus tendon.

Authors:  Thomas Magee; David Williams
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison with conventional MR imaging.

Authors:  B Flannigan; S Kursunoglu-Brahme; S Snyder; R Karzel; W Del Pizzo; D Resnick
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Rotator cuff tendon tears: evaluation with fat-suppressed MR imaging with arthroscopic correlation in 100 patients.

Authors:  S F Quinn; R C Sheley; T A Demlow; J Szumowski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Increased signal in the normal supraspinatus tendon on MR imaging: diagnostic pitfall caused by the magic-angle effect.

Authors:  M E Timins; S J Erickson; L D Estkowski; G F Carrera; R A Komorowski
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Diagnosis of partial and complete rotator cuff tears using combined gradient echo and spin echo imaging.

Authors:  M J Tuite; D R Yandow; A A DeSmet; J F Orwin; F A Quintana
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Rotator cuff lesions: signal patterns at MR imaging.

Authors:  M Rafii; H Firooznia; O Sherman; J Minkoff; J Weinreb; C Golimbu; R Gidumal; R Schinella; K Zaslav
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Supraspinatus tendon tears: comparison of US and MR arthrography with surgical correlation.

Authors:  Francesco S Ferrari; Simone Governi; Francesca Burresi; Francesco Vigni; Paolo Stefani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  MR arthrography of partial thickness tears of the undersurface of the rotator cuff: an arthroscopic correlation.

Authors:  Keith Meister; Jim Thesing; William J Montgomery; Peter A Indelicato; Steve Walczak; William Fontenot
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Rotator cuff: evaluation with fat-suppressed MR arthrography.

Authors:  W E Palmer; J H Brown; D I Rosenthal
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

1.  Tendon and ligament imaging.

Authors:  R J Hodgson; P J O'Connor; A J Grainger
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Detecting Rotator Cuff Tears: A Network Meta-analysis of 144 Diagnostic Studies.

Authors:  Fanxiao Liu; Jinlei Dong; Wun-Jer Shen; Qinglin Kang; Dongsheng Zhou; Fei Xiong
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-02-05

Review 3.  Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography, MRI and MR arthrography in the characterisation of rotator cuff disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Sébastien Roy; Caroline Braën; Jean Leblond; François Desmeules; Clermont E Dionne; Joy C MacDermid; Nathalie J Bureau; Pierre Frémont
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Comparison of MRI and MRA for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fanxiao Liu; Xiangyun Cheng; Jinlei Dong; Dongsheng Zhou; Shumei Han; Yongliang Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.