Literature DB >> 7720893

A comparison of different techniques for liver resection: blunt dissection, ultrasonic aspirator and jet-cutter.

H G Rau1, H M Schardey, E Buttler, C Reuter, T U Cohnert, F W Schildberg.   

Abstract

In a prospective study 116 patients underwent liver resection. Three different resection techniques, blunt dissection (n = 61), ultrasonic aspirator (CUSA) (n = 27) and jet-cutter (n = 28) were compared. Speed of resection, blood loss, transfusion rate, liver hilus clamping time and tissue damage were evaluated on the basis of area of transected liver surface. Liver resection with the jet-cutter was significantly faster with a resection time of 0.33 min/cm2 in comparison to blunt dissection (0.57 min/cm2) and CUSA (0.50 min/cm2) (P < 0.01) and associated with lower blood loss of 17.7 ml/cm2 (P < 0.01) than the other techniques (blunt dissection 32.5 ml/cm2, CUSA 24.3 ml/cm2). Tissue damage with respect to transaminases SGOT and SGPT was comparable to the other techniques. The jet-cutter is a promising new instrument in liver surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7720893     DOI: 10.1016/s0748-7983(95)90435-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  14 in total

1.  How should transection of the liver be performed?: a prospective randomized study in 100 consecutive patients: comparing four different transection strategies.

Authors:  Mickael Lesurtel; Markus Selzner; Henrik Petrowsky; Lucas McCormack; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Initial results of MR-guided liver resection in a high-field open MRI.

Authors:  Sascha Santosh Chopra; Sven Christian Schmidt; Robert Eisele; Ulf Teichgräber; Ivo Van der Voort; Christian Seebauer; Florian Streitparth; Guido Schumacher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Topical hemostasis in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Vecchio; R Catalano; F Basile; C Spataro; M Caputo; E Intagliata
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

Review 4.  Methods to decrease blood loss during liver resection: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elisabetta Moggia; Benjamin Rouse; Constantinos Simillis; Tianjing Li; Jessica Vaughan; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-31

5.  Alpha-gluthathione S-transferase as an early marker of hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury after liver resection.

Authors:  Alexander Choukér; André Martignoni; Rolf J Schauer; Martin Dugas; Thomas Schachtner; Ines Kaufmann; Florian Setzer; Horst G Rau; Florian Löhe; Karl W Jauch; Klaus Peter; Manfred Thiel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Waterjet dissection in the brain: review of the experimental and clinical data with special reference to meningioma surgery.

Authors:  Joachim Oertel; Michael Robert Gaab; Rolf Warzok; Jürgen Piek
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2002-12-06       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  A prospective study of in-line radiofrequency ablation in hepatic parenchymal transection--its efficacy and complications.

Authors:  Tristan D Yan; Taras Kusyk; Steven Daniel; Frank Chu; Aravin Gunasegaram; David Chang; David L Morris
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Water-jet dissection for parenchymal division during hepatectomy.

Authors:  Charles M Vollmer; Elijah Dixon; Ajay Sahajpal; Mark S Cattral; David R Grant; Steven Gallinger; Bryce R Taylor; Paul D Greig
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Open hepatic parenchymal transection using ultrasonic dissection and bipolar coagulation.

Authors:  Mickael Lesurtel; Jacques Belghiti
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  "Curettage and aspiration dissection technique" using PMOD for liver resection.

Authors:  S Y Peng; J T Li
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.